Files
session-history/ecomm/0018/SESSION-0018.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-10T00-38--2026-06-10T01-04.md
T

108 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Session 0018.0 — Transcript
> App: ecomm
> Start: 2026-06-10T00-38 (PST)
> End: 2026-06-10T01-04 (PST)
> Type: planning-and-executing
> Status: **FINALIZED**
## Launch prompt
```
Use the app launch tooling to create a new project called "wiggleverse-ecomm".
```
Classified at the session gate as **planning-and-executing** (a build/stand-up),
which claimed this transcript ID.
## Outcome
Stood up **`ecomm` as a new project** — a fresh implementation of Wiggleverse
ecomm (multi-tenant Shopify alternative), with the earlier R01R07 work kept
separately as a reference. Per operator choice: **full repo set** (code +
content), **truly minimal** skeletons, **no deploy** yet.
What now exists:
- **Code repo** `wiggleverse/wiggleverse-ecomm` (Gitea id=38, private,
`main` @ `994bde7`) — `app.json` (One Name `ecomm`), `README.md`, `CLAUDE.md`
(with the `@~/.claude/wiggleverse.md` org-context import), `.gitignore`.
- **Content repo** `wiggleverse/wiggleverse-ecomm-content` (id=39, private,
`main` @ `dc8d6e4`) — `specs/` + `plans/` collections (the finalize submit
targets), `README.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `.gitignore`.
- **`app.json`** — schemaVersion 1.1, validates against `app.schema.json`,
resolves `APP_NAME=ecomm`, `CONTENT_REMOTE` → the content repo, sessions →
`wiggleverse/session-history` subdir `ecomm`.
No application code yet — architecture is intentionally undecided, to be set in a
brainstorming session before the first release.
## Pre-state
- `~/git` parent (not a git repo); the target repo did not exist remotely.
- The R01R07 ecomm work had been renamed earlier the same day to a reference:
repos `wiggleverse-ecomm-prototype` + `-prototype-content`, app `ecomm-prototype`
(id=18). Memory recorded the intent: start `ecomm` fresh in a new
`wiggleverse-ecomm` (then "not yet stood up").
## Arc (turn by turn)
1. **Gate + routing.** Classified the request as planning-and-executing; ran
`wgl-planning-and-executing`. Could not claim immediately — the new repo
didn't exist, so there was no resolvable app yet.
2. **Governing rule check.** Read `~/.claude/wiggleverse.md`; `flotilla-only-provisioning`
(§8.5) makes initial provisioning an operator-run gesture in **both** postures.
Surfaced that the `launch-app` suite drives an *already-built* app to pre-prod
(its repo step pushes built code + a `v<VERSION>` tag + deploy creds), so it
does not fit a minimal new-project start.
3. **Scope confirmed (AskUserQuestion).** Operator chose **full repo set** +
**truly minimal** skeletons, no deploy.
4. **Built local skeletons** for both repos (git init, SSH remotes, files),
following `create-app-json.md` (One Name `ecomm`). Validated `app.json`
against the schema and confirmed `resolve-app.py` resolves it; **added the
`content` tag** to the content repo so `$CONTENT_REMOTE` resolves. Committed
both on `main`.
5. **Claimed this transcript** (session 0018; `session-history` already existed,
so the `ecomm/` subdir resolved). Seeded a `## Plan` block.
6. **Provisioning hand-off.** Per the rule, kept remote creation as the operator's
gesture. Drove `wgl-gitea-admin`; the API org-create **403s** (token is
`write:repository` only). Discovered `wiggleverse-ecomm` was a **rename-redirect
→ id=18** (leftover from the morning's rename), which would block reuse and,
crucially, would have made any SSH push resolve to the **reference repo**.
7. **Operator created both private repos in the Gitea UI** (path A), which cleared
the redirect — new ids 38 + 39, both empty.
8. **Guarded + pushed.** Confirmed `wiggleverse-ecomm` was empty (0 refs, new id
≠ 18) before pushing; pushed both skeletons over SSH. Verified remote `main`
matches local on both, and the reference repo (id=18) was untouched.
## Cut state
- Both repos: clean working tree, `main` = `origin/main`, nothing unpushed.
- No PRs (the initial skeleton commit establishes `main` directly — standard for
a brand-new repo).
- No implementation plan produced → nothing to archive to `plans/`.
- Pipeline §9: no deployable code → no pipeline stage run; nothing shipped beyond
the repos themselves.
- Memory updated: new `project_ecomm_clean.md`, `project_ecomm_build.md` reframed
as the reference, `MEMORY.md` index refreshed.
## Deferred decisions
Reported to the operator at closeout (all reversible, none challenged):
- **App One Name = `ecomm`** — derived per `create-app-json.md` §2
(`wiggleverse-ecomm` → strip `wiggleverse-`), reclaiming the short name now that
the reference is `ecomm-prototype`. Distinct GCP project/deploy key from the
reference. Alternative: keep `wiggleverse-ecomm` as the One Name.
- **Session subdir = `ecomm`** — shared with the reference's history (this is 0018,
after 0017), giving one continuous ecomm session history. Alternative: a separate
subdir for the new project.
- **Added `content` to the content repo's `contains`** so finalize's spec/plan
submit resolves a target (the reference's content repo lacked it).
## Next-session prompt
```
/goal Design the ecomm architecture and first release — open a brainstorming session to write the Solution-Design spec, drawing on the reference impl (wiggleverse-ecomm-prototype) and the harvested Shopify BDD corpus (wiggleverse-ecomm-prototype-content/research/shopify) as inputs; submit the spec to wiggleverse-ecomm-content/specs/
```