Files
session-history/engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md
T

81 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Session 0025.0 — Transcript
> App: engineering
> Start: 2026-06-22T07-40 (PST)
> Type: planning-and-executing
> Posture: yolo
> Claude-Session: 3141c3a0-ef70-4f90-9c36-f82858f08d3a
> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.**
>
> This file reserves session ID 0025 for engineering. The driver replaces this
> body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final
> SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--<end>.md form at session end.
## Launch prompt
```
Start F1 of the SDLC pipeline refactor — handbook reconciliation in
wiggleverse/engineering (issue #63 on the dev-claude-plugin tracker): §3.3
accretion, §4.3 slice-retirement (Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution;
Stories become standalone leaf issues, R2(b)), solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE
updates, and the documented home of the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision.
Source: engineering docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md (decisions locked).
It's the docs-lead spine F2F5 cite — first.
```
## Plan
> Anchor: design `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` (R2a — locked Solution-Design
> brief; eligibility ELIGIBLE). Work repo: `wiggleverse/engineering`. Feature #63 on
> the dev-claude-plugin tracker. Branch: `feat/sdlc-f1-handbook-reconciliation`.
**F1 — Handbook reconciliation for the staged-gate SDLC pipeline.** Reconcile the
canonical engineering docs to the brief's locked decisions. F1 is the *only* Feature
touching `engineering` (F2F5 are dev-claude-plugin), so the full handbook sweep
happens here or never — internal consistency is required, not optional.
Deliverables (per brief §F1):
1. **§3.3 accretion** (README) — the Solution Design is authored by ACCRETION: each
design-track lens (business → product → engineering) is written into the same
growing SPEC at its own gated stage; never separate brd.md/prd.md files; one
coherent doc `superpowers:writing-plans` consumes. Reframe the Delivery row +
traceability row (drop "Slice").
2. **§4.3 reconciliation** (README) — Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution;
its internal units are the plan's Tasks (not slices/Stories). Feature→Story(slice)
sub-layer retired; Stories are STANDALONE leaf issues only (R2(b)). "Slice" is not
used (superpowers grain: sub-project / spec / plan / Task / Step). R1R4 intact.
3. **GUIDE/TEMPLATE** — accretion authoring model (replaces "drafted whole, reviewed
whole"); §7 Delivery Plan = rollout/launch strategy only (retire §7.2 "Slicing
plan" task-checklist; renumber 7.3→7.2, 7.4→7.3); relocate the `**Design:**` field
to §5.1 (Product lens, with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision); drop "Slice"
columns from traceability + docs tables.
4. **Claude-Design-vs-Code home** — keep §5.1 (Product/prd lens) as the documented
home; note the decision is authored at the prd-lens stage under accretion.
5. **Full slice sweep** across README §4 day-to-day, §7 roadmap, §10, lifecycle tree.
Then: verify (residual-slice grep + internal §7.x ref check) → commit → PR → merge.
No engineering version bump (handbook, not a semver'd plugin). No code/tests/PPE
(docs-only; the pipeline's E2E/PPE gates don't apply to a prose change).
## Deferred decisions
_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
finalize. Empty if none._
- **Full-handbook slice sweep (scope).** The brief's F1 item enumerates §3.3/§4.3/
GUIDE/TEMPLATE/claude-design-home, but "slice" is load-bearing in README §7
(roadmap) and §4 too. Since F1 is the only engineering-touching Feature, I swept
all of them for internal consistency rather than leaving §7 contradicting a
slice-retired §4.3. Confidence high (forced by the decomposition), logged for
visibility.
- **`**Design:**` field relocation + plugin lag.** Retiring per-slice §7.2 leaves the
shipped `**Design:**` field (consumed by `wgl-design-handoff` + the design-readiness
soft gate, which read it per-`--slice`) without a slice home. I relocated it to the
SPEC's §5.1 (Product lens), co-located with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision —
one SPEC = one design decision. The plugin's `--slice`-grained plumbing
(`backfill-spec-design.sh`, `design-readiness.sh`) now lags the docs and needs a
downstream reconciliation (candidate: F5 wiring / a follow-up issue). Flagged, not
fixed in F1 (docs-lead-automation, §4.1).