Files
session-history/ohm/0082/SESSION-0082.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-06T01-09--INPROGRESS.md
T

107 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Session 0082.0 — Transcript
> App: ohm
> Start: 2026-06-06T01-09 (PST)
> Type: coding
> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.**
>
> This file reserves session ID 0082 for ohm. The driver replaces this
> body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final
> SESSION-0082.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-06T01-09--<end>.md form at session end.
## Launch prompt
`/goal next` — resume the stored next-goal recorded at session 0078's finalize:
**S6, the final §22 three-tier slice** (per-type frontmatter/surfaces keyed on
collection `type`, request-to-join + cross-collection inbox, per-collection
`enabled_models`, the registry + `.collection.yaml` format in `docs/DEPLOYMENTS.md`,
two-project/multi-collection e2e, the §20.4 changelog, and the **SPEC merge**
applying Part A + Part D and landing the S3 §B.1/§B.3 keystone reinterpretation).
Per `docs/design/2026-06-05-three-tier-projects-collections.md` Part E (S6).
## Plan
S6 is large — seven deliverables, three of them net-new features. Decomposed into
reviewable branch→PR→merge increments on `origin` (git.wiggleverse.org), ordered
keystone-first:
- **PR-A — SPEC merge (keystone).** Write a fresh §22 (Part A three-tier model)
into `SPEC.md`; apply Part D amendments in place to §1/§2/§5/§6; land the S3
§B.1/§B.3 keystone reinterpretation; document the `projects.yaml` +
`.collection.yaml` format in `docs/DEPLOYMENTS.md`. Docs-only, no migration —
fully realizes the three-tier model in the binding contract.
- **PR-B — per-collection `enabled_models`.** Migration 031 adds `collections.config_json`;
parse from `.collection.yaml`; surface in the collection API; thread to the
provider/model layer.
- **PR-C — per-type frontmatter + surfaces** keyed on the collection's `type`.
- **PR-D — request-to-join + cross-collection inbox.**
- **PR-E — two-project/multi-collection e2e + §20.4 changelog + version bump**
(the release wrap for the whole §22 series).
## Progress (checkpoint)
Branch `feat/s6-three-tier-final` off `main` (`b073738`). Commits so far:
1. **`26f3680` — SPEC merge (keystone).** §22.1–§22.14 written into `SPEC.md`
(three-tier model, registry + `.collection.yaml`, unified roles, four-layer
union, the keystone §B.1/§B.3 reinterpretation); forward-pointer amendment
notes at §1/§2/§5/§6; `docs/DEPLOYMENTS.md` registry + manifest format.
2. **`79a27a9` — per-collection `enabled_models` (§22.12).** Migration 031
(`collections.config_json`); manifest parse; `models_resolver`
project→collection narrowing chain; API surfacing. 9 vertical tests.
3. **`839404d` — type-driven entry noun (§22.4a).** `collections.entry_noun`
source-of-truth map; surfaced on collection/directory/project APIs; Catalog +
ProposeModal chrome read it. 3 vertical tests.
Gate after each: backend **528 passed**, frontend **30 passed** + build green.
Remaining this session: a two-project/multi-collection integrative test, the
§20.4 changelog + upgrade-steps, and the **v0.45.0** version bump (the release
wrap). Then PR → merge on `origin`. Handoff (next goal): the OPEN type-module
surfaces (per-type frontmatter schemas, specification release-planning, bdd
scenario/coverage) and request-to-join + cross-collection inbox — both want a
spec pass first.
## Deferred decisions
- **S6 structure: single branch, single v0.45.0 release (autonomous call).** The
recorded goal bundles S6 as one slice spanning a major SPEC merge + three
net-new features + release. The repo's established pattern is one release per
slice (S1S5 = 0.40.00.44.0), and the original plan said S6 "ships as one
minor at M7." So all of S6 lands on one branch `feat/s6-three-tier-final` with
structured per-deliverable commits and a single v0.45.0 release (VERSION +
CHANGELOG + §20.4 upgrade-steps in the final commit) — not 5 micro-releases or
5 coordinated PRs. The SPEC references v0.45.0 throughout accordingly.
- **In-place §22.14 amendments vs. scattered notes (autonomous call).** Part D's
amendments are applied as a consolidated §22.14 subsection PLUS concise
forward-pointer blockquotes at §1/§2/§5/§6 (house style, cf. §1's v0.31.0
note) — rather than rewriting each section's body wholesale, which would be
far more invasive and risk breaking load-bearing cross-references mid-document.
- **The three feature areas (enabled_models / type surfaces / request-to-join)
have no pre-written BDD scenarios** (Part C covers only role/invitation/empty-
state) and E.2 deferred "request-to-join nuances" + "per-type role labels" from
the first pass — so their detailed shape is designed this session against the
design doc's direction.
- **Mid-session scope re-cut (autonomous call, after keystone + enabled_models
shipped).** S6's remaining items split by specification maturity. PR-B
(enabled_models) is fully specified by §22.12 → shipped. PR-C's *entry-noun
terminology* (§22.4a item 2: document→"RFC" / specification→"Spec" /
bdd→"Feature") is concrete and completable → doing it. But the FULL type-module
surfaces (§22.4a items 1+3: per-type frontmatter schemas, the `specification`
release-planning data model, the `bdd` scenario/coverage views) are flagged
OPEN in the design doc itself ("first proposals, to be pinned in the
type-surface slice"), and request-to-join + cross-collection inbox (PR-D) is a
whole subsystem E.2 deferred. Building those FULLY in one autonomous code
session, without their BDD specs, would be guessing at product shape — lower
quality than the team's discovery→spec→code flow. **Decision:** deliver the
well-specified, completable scope to a high bar (keystone SPEC merge ✅,
enabled_models ✅, entry-noun terminology), RELEASE it as v0.45.0 (the defining
S6 outcome — "§22 three-tier fully realized in SPEC.md"), and record a precise
next-goal for the genuinely-open type-module + membership-lifecycle work, which
wants a spec pass first. Honors "carry to done" for the completable scope
without rushing under-specified features.
_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
finalize._