session-history/ohm/0082/SESSION-0082.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-06T01-09--INPROGRESS.md

Session 0082.0 — Transcript

App: ohm Start: 2026-06-06T01-09 (PST) Type: coding Status: PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.

This file reserves session ID 0082 for ohm. The driver replaces this body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final SESSION-0082.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-06T01-09--.md form at session end.

Launch prompt

/goal next — resume the stored next-goal recorded at session 0078's finalize: S6, the final §22 three-tier slice (per-type frontmatter/surfaces keyed on collection type, request-to-join + cross-collection inbox, per-collection enabled_models, the registry + .collection.yaml format in docs/DEPLOYMENTS.md, two-project/multi-collection e2e, the §20.4 changelog, and the SPEC merge applying Part A + Part D and landing the S3 §B.1/§B.3 keystone reinterpretation). Per docs/design/2026-06-05-three-tier-projects-collections.md Part E (S6).

Plan

S6 is large — seven deliverables, three of them net-new features. Decomposed into reviewable branch→PR→merge increments on origin (git.wiggleverse.org), ordered keystone-first:

• PR-A — SPEC merge (keystone). Write a fresh §22 (Part A three-tier model) into SPEC.md; apply Part D amendments in place to §1/§2/§5/§6; land the S3 §B.1/§B.3 keystone reinterpretation; document the projects.yaml + .collection.yaml format in docs/DEPLOYMENTS.md. Docs-only, no migration — fully realizes the three-tier model in the binding contract.
• PR-B — per-collection enabled_models. Migration 031 adds collections.config_json; parse from .collection.yaml; surface in the collection API; thread to the provider/model layer.
• PR-C — per-type frontmatter + surfaces keyed on the collection's type.
• PR-D — request-to-join + cross-collection inbox.
• PR-E — two-project/multi-collection e2e + §20.4 changelog + version bump (the release wrap for the whole §22 series).

Progress (checkpoint)

Branch feat/s6-three-tier-final off main (b073738). Commits so far:

1. 26f3680 — SPEC merge (keystone). §22.1–§22.14 written into SPEC.md (three-tier model, registry + .collection.yaml, unified roles, four-layer union, the keystone §B.1/§B.3 reinterpretation); forward-pointer amendment notes at §1/§2/§5/§6; docs/DEPLOYMENTS.md registry + manifest format.
2. 79a27a9 — per-collection enabled_models (§22.12). Migration 031 (collections.config_json); manifest parse; models_resolver project→collection narrowing chain; API surfacing. 9 vertical tests.
3. 839404d — type-driven entry noun (§22.4a). collections.entry_noun source-of-truth map; surfaced on collection/directory/project APIs; Catalog + ProposeModal chrome read it. 3 vertical tests.

Gate after each: backend 528 passed, frontend 30 passed + build green.

Remaining this session: a two-project/multi-collection integrative test, the §20.4 changelog + upgrade-steps, and the v0.45.0 version bump (the release wrap). Then PR → merge on origin. Handoff (next goal): the OPEN type-module surfaces (per-type frontmatter schemas, specification release-planning, bdd scenario/coverage) and request-to-join + cross-collection inbox — both want a spec pass first.

Deferred decisions

• S6 structure: single branch, single v0.45.0 release (autonomous call). The recorded goal bundles S6 as one slice spanning a major SPEC merge + three net-new features + release. The repo's established pattern is one release per slice (S1–S5 = 0.40.0–0.44.0), and the original plan said S6 "ships as one minor at M7." So all of S6 lands on one branch feat/s6-three-tier-final with structured per-deliverable commits and a single v0.45.0 release (VERSION + CHANGELOG + §20.4 upgrade-steps in the final commit) — not 5 micro-releases or 5 coordinated PRs. The SPEC references v0.45.0 throughout accordingly.
• In-place §22.14 amendments vs. scattered notes (autonomous call). Part D's amendments are applied as a consolidated §22.14 subsection PLUS concise forward-pointer blockquotes at §1/§2/§5/§6 (house style, cf. §1's v0.31.0 note) — rather than rewriting each section's body wholesale, which would be far more invasive and risk breaking load-bearing cross-references mid-document.
• The three feature areas (enabled_models / type surfaces / request-to-join) have no pre-written BDD scenarios (Part C covers only role/invitation/empty- state) and E.2 deferred "request-to-join nuances" + "per-type role labels" from the first pass — so their detailed shape is designed this session against the design doc's direction.
• Mid-session scope re-cut (autonomous call, after keystone + enabled_models shipped). S6's remaining items split by specification maturity. PR-B (enabled_models) is fully specified by §22.12 → shipped. PR-C's entry-noun terminology (§22.4a item 2: document→"RFC" / specification→"Spec" / bdd→"Feature") is concrete and completable → doing it. But the FULL type-module surfaces (§22.4a items 1+3: per-type frontmatter schemas, the specification release-planning data model, the bdd scenario/coverage views) are flagged OPEN in the design doc itself ("first proposals, to be pinned in the type-surface slice"), and request-to-join + cross-collection inbox (PR-D) is a whole subsystem E.2 deferred. Building those FULLY in one autonomous code session, without their BDD specs, would be guessing at product shape — lower quality than the team's discovery→spec→code flow. Decision: deliver the well-specified, completable scope to a high bar (keystone SPEC merge ✅, enabled_models ✅, entry-noun terminology), RELEASE it as v0.45.0 (the defining S6 outcome — "§22 three-tier fully realized in SPEC.md"), and record a precise next-goal for the genuinely-open type-module + membership-lifecycle work, which wants a spec pass first. Honors "carry to done" for the completable scope without rushing under-specified features.

Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at finalize.