148 lines
8.7 KiB
Markdown
148 lines
8.7 KiB
Markdown
# Session 0026.0 — Transcript
|
||
|
||
> App: dev-claude-plugin
|
||
> Start: 2026-06-07T09-50 (PST)
|
||
> End: 2026-06-07T10-37 (PST)
|
||
> Type: coding
|
||
> Status: **FINALIZED — SP1 shipped as 0.19.0 (PR #19, merge `0afbde1`).**
|
||
|
||
## Outcome (TL;DR)
|
||
|
||
Resumed the 0024 design via `/goal next`, wrote the impl plan, executed all 11 tasks,
|
||
and **shipped SP1 — feedback as Gitea issues — as plugin 0.19.0** (PR #19 → `main`,
|
||
merge `0afbde1`). Plugin feedback now lives as **Gitea issues** on the plugin's own
|
||
tracker, not the `feedback/` file corpus (README-only now). The 4 old `new` notes are
|
||
migrated to issues **#15–#18** (untriaged). Verified end-to-end live.
|
||
|
||
Two notable events: a **token-scope blocker** (the default git token lacks the `issue`
|
||
OAuth scope → 403; resolved with a dedicated issue-scoped Keychain token via
|
||
`--token-service`), and the **§5.4 shared-checkout hazard hitting live** (a concurrent
|
||
session switched this checkout's branch mid-finalize — work survived because it was
|
||
pushed; shipped server-side via the Gitea API).
|
||
|
||
## Launch prompt
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
/goal next → resume stored Next /goal: Implement SP1 — feedback as Gitea issues
|
||
from the approved design docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-07-feedback-as-gitea-issues-design.md,
|
||
on the already-pushed branch feat/feedback-as-gitea-issues. Run writing-plans from
|
||
the spec → executing-plans. Ship 0.19.0.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Plan
|
||
|
||
**Goal:** Implement SP1 — feedback as Gitea issues — per the approved design
|
||
`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-07-feedback-as-gitea-issues-design.md`, on branch
|
||
`feat/feedback-as-gitea-issues`. Ship 0.19.0.
|
||
|
||
Move plugin feedback OUT of the in-repo `feedback/` file corpus INTO Gitea issues
|
||
on `wiggleverse/wiggleverse-dev-claude-plugin`:
|
||
|
||
1. **Label model** — `ensure-feedback-labels.sh` creates canonical labels
|
||
idempotently (`triaged:accepted`, `resolution:done|declined|duplicate`,
|
||
`type:bug|friction|enhancement|idea`, `severity:low|medium|high`).
|
||
2. **Scripts as thin `gitea-api.sh` wrappers** — `file-feedback.sh` (replaces
|
||
`record-feedback.sh`), rewritten `list-feedback.sh`, rewritten
|
||
`set-feedback-status.sh`.
|
||
3. **Skill rewrites** — `wgl-dev-plugin-feedback` (capture) files an issue;
|
||
`wgl-dev-plugin-review-feedback` (review) points at issues + label model
|
||
(direct triage-and-fix kept for SP1; SP2 note).
|
||
4. **Migration** — 4 existing `new` notes → issues; delete note files; repurpose
|
||
`feedback/README.md` for the issue-based corpus.
|
||
5. **New SessionStart hook** `hooks/feedback-notice` — plugin-repo-only, fail-open,
|
||
counts open issues, nudges `/goal feedback`.
|
||
6. **Housekeeping** — `plugin.json` 0.18.0→0.19.0; CLAUDE.md hooks inventory 3→4 +
|
||
feedback-in-issues note.
|
||
|
||
Process: `writing-plans` from the design → `executing-plans`. SP2 (`/goal feedback`
|
||
orchestrator) is deferred.
|
||
|
||
## Pre-state
|
||
|
||
- Branch `feat/feedback-as-gitea-issues` carried only the 0024 design doc (1 commit
|
||
ahead of main). `feedback/` held 4 `new` notes + the README. Plugin at 0.18.0.
|
||
3 hooks. Token: only the default per-host git token (no issue scope) known.
|
||
|
||
## Session arc
|
||
|
||
1. **Init + plan.** `/goal next` → gate read the stored `Next /goal:` → coding session
|
||
`wgl-session-coding-init` claimed **0026** (peek surfaced 0020/0021/0022/0025 stale
|
||
placeholders; yolo proceeded). Read the approved design; ran `superpowers:writing-plans`
|
||
to author `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-06-07-feedback-as-gitea-issues.md` (11 tasks,
|
||
full script bodies). Then `superpowers:executing-plans`.
|
||
2. **Token-scope wall (T1).** First live `ensure-feedback-labels.sh` run → **403** on
|
||
`GET /labels`. Diagnosed: repo `permissions:{admin,push,pull}` ≠ token OAuth scopes;
|
||
the resolved token (and legacy `ohm-gitea-token`) lack the `issue` scope. The design's
|
||
"feasibility verified" had checked the wrong object. **Fix:** thread a dedicated
|
||
issue-scoped Keychain token through every script + the hook via `gitea-api.sh
|
||
--token-service`, default service `wgl-gitea-issues-readwrite-token`, env override
|
||
`WGL_FEEDBACK_TOKEN_SERVICE`. Updated the plan's shared preamble too.
|
||
3. **All offline work (T1–T8, T10).** Wrote the 4 scripts, the hook + `hooks.json`
|
||
registration, rewrote both skills + `feedback/README.md`, bumped `plugin.json`→0.19.0,
|
||
CLAUDE.md hooks 3→4 — each `bash -n` / dry-run / fail-open verified, committed, pushed.
|
||
4. **Blocked on the token.** The operator's new Keychain entry wasn't resolvable
|
||
(`find-generic-password -s` found nothing; full keychain dump confirmed absence — it
|
||
needed to go into the login keychain with an explicit `-s`). Surfaced the precise fix,
|
||
checkpointed the transcript, staged a one-shot migration runner, and asked via
|
||
`AskUserQuestion`. Operator chose "add the token now" and re-added it correctly.
|
||
5. **Live phase (T4 live, T9, T11).** Token resolved → **HTTP 200**. Created 11 labels;
|
||
ran the scratch-issue lifecycle (#14: file→accept→done→closed); migrated the 4 notes to
|
||
issues **#15–#18** (untriaged, correct type/severity labels); deleted the note files.
|
||
Full verification green (labels idempotent; `feedback-notice` fires 4-open/4-untriaged
|
||
in-repo, silent elsewhere; all syntax clean).
|
||
6. **Ship — server-side.** At finalize, discovered the local checkout had been switched to
|
||
a **concurrent session's branch** `feat/two-session-artifact-collections` (§5.4 hazard).
|
||
My work was safe on `origin` (verified: head = migration commit, plugin.json 0.19.0,
|
||
feedback/ = README only). Shipped **entirely via the Gitea API** — created PR #19, merged
|
||
(`Do:merge`, commit `0afbde1`), deleted the merged branch — without touching the local
|
||
tree. `main` confirmed at 0.19.0.
|
||
|
||
## Cut state
|
||
|
||
- **Shipped:** plugin **0.19.0** on `main` (PR #19, merge `0afbde1`). Feedback issues
|
||
#15–#18 untriaged on the tracker; scratch #14 closed.
|
||
- **Not done (intentionally):** operator re-install to make 0.19.0 (and the lagging
|
||
0.16.0–0.18.0) live — the `feedback-notice` hook activates on the next NEW plugin-repo
|
||
session post-install. Local checkout deliberately left on the other session's branch.
|
||
|
||
## Deferred decisions
|
||
|
||
_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
|
||
liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
|
||
finalize. Empty if none._
|
||
|
||
- **Token-scope gap vs. the approved design.** The design declared SP1 feasibility
|
||
"verified live" on the repo `permissions:{admin,push,pull}` object — but that is the
|
||
user's role on the repo, not the token's OAuth scopes. The issue/label endpoints need
|
||
the `issue` scope, which the resolved token lacks (403). Handled by introducing a
|
||
dedicated issue-scoped Keychain entry selected via `--token-service`
|
||
(`WGL_FEEDBACK_TOKEN_SERVICE`), keeping git transport / gitea-admin on their own token.
|
||
This is a correctness deviation from the design's single-token assumption; logged here
|
||
and documented in the plan. *(A good candidate to file as a feedback ISSUE once the
|
||
flow is live — the design's feasibility-check method missed token scope.)*
|
||
- **Review status edits ride the API, not the PR.** The design said review status edits
|
||
"ride in the same branch→PR." With issues (not tree files) the label/comment/close
|
||
happen immediately via the API; only the code change rides the PR. Documented honestly
|
||
in the rewritten review skill + `feedback/README.md`.
|
||
- **Script `gitea-api.sh` resolution.** Scripts resolve `gitea-api.sh` relative to their
|
||
own dir with a `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` fallback (vs. the design's bare
|
||
`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/…`), so they run from a source checkout where that var is unset.
|
||
- **Shipped via API, not local merge.** Because a concurrent session held the local
|
||
checkout on its own branch, the PR create + merge + branch-delete all went through the
|
||
Gitea API rather than a local merge — the safe path given the shared-checkout collision.
|
||
|
||
## Next session
|
||
|
||
SP1 is shipped. The natural follow-on is **SP2 — the `/goal feedback` orchestrator**,
|
||
now doubly unblocked (effort B's superpowers verbiage in 0.18.0 + SP1 in 0.19.0) and with
|
||
4 real feedback issues (#15–#18) to dogfood it on. Its own brainstorm→design→plan.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
/goal SP2 — evolve wgl-dev-plugin-review-feedback into the /goal feedback orchestrator (gate special-cases /goal feedback like /goal next → tracked brainstorming over the open feedback issues #15–#18 → per-issue integrate/defer/decline/duplicate → writing-plans → executing-plans, closing resolution:done at finalize), per the SP2 section of docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-07-feedback-as-gitea-issues-design.md
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Also worth filing as feedback issues now the flow is live: the **token-scope
|
||
feasibility-check gap** and the **shared-checkout concurrency hazard** seen this session
|
||
(both noted in memory). And the perennial **operator re-install** to make 0.19.0 live.
|