update SESSION-L-TRANSCRIPT-2026-05-28T04-22--2026-05-28T05-17.md

This commit is contained in:
Ben Stull
2026-05-28 05:25:59 -07:00
parent b983b7d561
commit c49ab50202
@@ -528,13 +528,45 @@ memory at
so future driver sessions honor the "transcript is the LAST
thing before publish" discipline. Memory index updated.
### Arc 10 — Final transcript pass + publish
### Arc 10 — First transcript pass + publish
This file. Final pass folds in arcs 19 + this arc; cut-state
reflects the protocol amendment + the publish-script edit + the
memory captured. Published via
This file's first "final" pass folded in arcs 19 + arc 10;
cut-state reflected the protocol amendment + the publish-script
edit + the memory captured. Published via
`~/git/ohm-infra/scripts/publish-transcript.sh` to
`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history`.
`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history` at commit `b983b7d`.
### Arc 11 — Operator reinforced the final-step discipline; re-finalize + re-publish
Immediately after the first publish, the operator repeated the
instruction: "and then update the transcript again — always do
that as a final step of a session." This is precisely the
pattern the new feedback memory
(`feedback_transcript_is_final_step.md`) anticipates: a "finalized"
transcript that gets new material added after it (in this case,
the arc-9 protocol-amendment exchange itself + the driver's
closing summary that surfaced the next-session prompt) is not
yet final — the discipline is to apply the new material AND
finalize AGAIN AND re-publish.
So this arc 11 captures: the operator reinforced the discipline,
the driver re-finalized the transcript with this arc included,
and re-published. The publish script's idempotent-on-identical /
update-on-changed behavior means the re-publish lands as an
"Update SESSION-L-TRANSCRIPT-…md" commit on
`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history`, not a duplicate file. The
filename's `--<end>` timestamp stays the original
`2026-05-28T05-17` (the time of the first finalization); the
re-finalized content acknowledges that the actual session end
crept a few minutes later (~05-25 PST) as the discipline-
reinforcement exchange happened.
Future driver sessions should expect this pattern to recur:
"finalization" is not a one-shot gesture. Any operator
instruction landing after the first publish triggers another
finalize + re-publish cycle. The discipline is captured for
Session M onward in the next-session prompt's closing block
+ the feedback memory.
---