update SESSION-L-TRANSCRIPT-2026-05-28T04-22--2026-05-28T05-17.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -528,13 +528,45 @@ memory at
|
||||
so future driver sessions honor the "transcript is the LAST
|
||||
thing before publish" discipline. Memory index updated.
|
||||
|
||||
### Arc 10 — Final transcript pass + publish
|
||||
### Arc 10 — First transcript pass + publish
|
||||
|
||||
This file. Final pass folds in arcs 1–9 + this arc; cut-state
|
||||
reflects the protocol amendment + the publish-script edit + the
|
||||
memory captured. Published via
|
||||
This file's first "final" pass folded in arcs 1–9 + arc 10;
|
||||
cut-state reflected the protocol amendment + the publish-script
|
||||
edit + the memory captured. Published via
|
||||
`~/git/ohm-infra/scripts/publish-transcript.sh` to
|
||||
`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history`.
|
||||
`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history` at commit `b983b7d`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Arc 11 — Operator reinforced the final-step discipline; re-finalize + re-publish
|
||||
|
||||
Immediately after the first publish, the operator repeated the
|
||||
instruction: "and then update the transcript again — always do
|
||||
that as a final step of a session." This is precisely the
|
||||
pattern the new feedback memory
|
||||
(`feedback_transcript_is_final_step.md`) anticipates: a "finalized"
|
||||
transcript that gets new material added after it (in this case,
|
||||
the arc-9 protocol-amendment exchange itself + the driver's
|
||||
closing summary that surfaced the next-session prompt) is not
|
||||
yet final — the discipline is to apply the new material AND
|
||||
finalize AGAIN AND re-publish.
|
||||
|
||||
So this arc 11 captures: the operator reinforced the discipline,
|
||||
the driver re-finalized the transcript with this arc included,
|
||||
and re-published. The publish script's idempotent-on-identical /
|
||||
update-on-changed behavior means the re-publish lands as an
|
||||
"Update SESSION-L-TRANSCRIPT-…md" commit on
|
||||
`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history`, not a duplicate file. The
|
||||
filename's `--<end>` timestamp stays the original
|
||||
`2026-05-28T05-17` (the time of the first finalization); the
|
||||
re-finalized content acknowledges that the actual session end
|
||||
crept a few minutes later (~05-25 PST) as the discipline-
|
||||
reinforcement exchange happened.
|
||||
|
||||
Future driver sessions should expect this pattern to recur:
|
||||
"finalization" is not a one-shot gesture. Any operator
|
||||
instruction landing after the first publish triggers another
|
||||
finalize + re-publish cycle. The discipline is captured for
|
||||
Session M onward in the next-session prompt's closing block
|
||||
+ the feedback memory.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user