add engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--2026-06-22T08-05.md + replace placeholder/variant SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Session 0025.0 — Transcript
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> App: engineering
|
||||||
|
> Start: 2026-06-22T07-40 (PST)
|
||||||
|
> Type: planning-and-executing
|
||||||
|
> Posture: yolo
|
||||||
|
> Claude-Session: 3141c3a0-ef70-4f90-9c36-f82858f08d3a
|
||||||
|
> End: 2026-06-22T08-05 (PST)
|
||||||
|
> Status: **FINALIZED.**
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> Cross-repo session: launched from the dev-claude-plugin worktree; work-repo is
|
||||||
|
> `wiggleverse/engineering` (handbook). Anchor: the locked design brief
|
||||||
|
> `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` (R2a).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Session arc (turn-by-turn)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Gate + init.** Classified the `/goal` launch as planning-and-executing.
|
||||||
|
Claimed engineering session 0025 (`--repo engineering`); peeked 4 stale orphan
|
||||||
|
`--INPROGRESS` placeholders (0009/0017/0021/0024, 9–12d old — not live, noted &
|
||||||
|
left). Verified clean `main`. Eligibility: ELIGIBLE via R2a on the brief (a
|
||||||
|
bare `type/feature` #63 is R3-ineligible).
|
||||||
|
2. **Orientation.** Read the brief (locked decisions) + the current state of
|
||||||
|
handbook §3.3/§4.3, solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE, claude-design-vs-code.md.
|
||||||
|
Swept all "slice" usage → found it load-bearing across README §3.3/§4/§4.3/§7/
|
||||||
|
§10 + GUIDE/TEMPLATE §7. Resolved scope: F1 is the *only* engineering-touching
|
||||||
|
Feature (F2–F5 are dev-claude-plugin), so the full handbook sweep happens here
|
||||||
|
for internal consistency.
|
||||||
|
3. **INCIDENT (caught + fixed).** First checkpoint ran `publish-transcript.sh`
|
||||||
|
without `--repo`; cwd-resolution mis-published 0025 into `dev-claude-plugin/`
|
||||||
|
and git-rm'd a real June-7 transcript on a same-ordinal collision. Reverted +
|
||||||
|
re-pushed the session-history remote, republished correctly with `--repo`.
|
||||||
|
Plugin foot-gun flagged via spawn_task (resolve app from staging path, scope
|
||||||
|
same-ordinal replacement to one app).
|
||||||
|
4. **Execute.** Reconciled 5 files (README, agent-context digest, GUIDE,
|
||||||
|
TEMPLATE, claude-design-vs-code) — accretion model, slice-retirement, §7
|
||||||
|
restructure + renumber, `**Design:**` field relocation to §5.1.
|
||||||
|
5. **Verify + ship.** Residual-slice grep (only intentional naming left), table
|
||||||
|
column + §7.x cross-ref checks. Committed, PR engineering #64, merged to main,
|
||||||
|
#63 auto-closed, branch deleted, local main synced.
|
||||||
|
6. **Finalize.** Base survey clean; no plan artifact to archive (prose
|
||||||
|
reconciliation, not a writing-plans doc); docs-only → no §9 pipeline stage;
|
||||||
|
memory + transcript.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The full, uncurated turn-by-turn (every tool call and wrong turn — incl. the
|
||||||
|
mis-publish) is the session conversation log; this is the protocol record.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Launch prompt
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
Start F1 of the SDLC pipeline refactor — handbook reconciliation in
|
||||||
|
wiggleverse/engineering (issue #63 on the dev-claude-plugin tracker): §3.3
|
||||||
|
accretion, §4.3 slice-retirement (Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution;
|
||||||
|
Stories become standalone leaf issues, R2(b)), solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE
|
||||||
|
updates, and the documented home of the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision.
|
||||||
|
Source: engineering docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md (decisions locked).
|
||||||
|
It's the docs-lead spine F2–F5 cite — first.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Plan
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Anchor: design `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` (R2a — locked Solution-Design
|
||||||
|
> brief; eligibility ELIGIBLE). Work repo: `wiggleverse/engineering`. Feature #63 on
|
||||||
|
> the dev-claude-plugin tracker. Branch: `feat/sdlc-f1-handbook-reconciliation`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**F1 — Handbook reconciliation for the staged-gate SDLC pipeline.** Reconcile the
|
||||||
|
canonical engineering docs to the brief's locked decisions. F1 is the *only* Feature
|
||||||
|
touching `engineering` (F2–F5 are dev-claude-plugin), so the full handbook sweep
|
||||||
|
happens here or never — internal consistency is required, not optional.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Deliverables (per brief §F1):
|
||||||
|
1. **§3.3 accretion** (README) — the Solution Design is authored by ACCRETION: each
|
||||||
|
design-track lens (business → product → engineering) is written into the same
|
||||||
|
growing SPEC at its own gated stage; never separate brd.md/prd.md files; one
|
||||||
|
coherent doc `superpowers:writing-plans` consumes. Reframe the Delivery row +
|
||||||
|
traceability row (drop "Slice").
|
||||||
|
2. **§4.3 reconciliation** (README) — Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution;
|
||||||
|
its internal units are the plan's Tasks (not slices/Stories). Feature→Story(slice)
|
||||||
|
sub-layer retired; Stories are STANDALONE leaf issues only (R2(b)). "Slice" is not
|
||||||
|
used (superpowers grain: sub-project / spec / plan / Task / Step). R1–R4 intact.
|
||||||
|
3. **GUIDE/TEMPLATE** — accretion authoring model (replaces "drafted whole, reviewed
|
||||||
|
whole"); §7 Delivery Plan = rollout/launch strategy only (retire §7.2 "Slicing
|
||||||
|
plan" task-checklist; renumber 7.3→7.2, 7.4→7.3); relocate the `**Design:**` field
|
||||||
|
to §5.1 (Product lens, with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision); drop "Slice"
|
||||||
|
columns from traceability + docs tables.
|
||||||
|
4. **Claude-Design-vs-Code home** — keep §5.1 (Product/prd lens) as the documented
|
||||||
|
home; note the decision is authored at the prd-lens stage under accretion.
|
||||||
|
5. **Full slice sweep** across README §4 day-to-day, §7 roadmap, §10, lifecycle tree.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then: verify (residual-slice grep + internal §7.x ref check) → commit → PR → merge.
|
||||||
|
No engineering version bump (handbook, not a semver'd plugin). No code/tests/PPE
|
||||||
|
(docs-only; the pipeline's E2E/PPE gates don't apply to a prose change).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**F1 shipped.** PR #64 (`feat/sdlc-f1-handbook-reconciliation`) merged to
|
||||||
|
`engineering/main` at 5054465; Feature **#63** ("Handbook: stage-gate the SDLC
|
||||||
|
pipeline", engineering tracker) auto-closed via `Fixes #63`. Five files reconciled
|
||||||
|
(README.md, agent-context.md, solution-design/{GUIDE,TEMPLATE,claude-design-vs-code}.md):
|
||||||
|
+212/−164.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **§3.3** — accretion authoring model; Delivery Plan = rollout/launch strategy,
|
||||||
|
not a task list.
|
||||||
|
- **§4.3** — Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; internal units = the
|
||||||
|
plan's Tasks; Feature→Story→"slice" sub-layer retired; Stories standalone leaf
|
||||||
|
issues only (R2(b)); "slice" terminology retired. R1–R4 intact.
|
||||||
|
- **GUIDE/TEMPLATE** — accretion (replaces drafted-whole/reviewed-whole); §7 = rollout/
|
||||||
|
launch only (retired §7.2 Slicing plan; renumber 7.3→7.2, 7.4→7.3); `**Design:**`
|
||||||
|
field relocated to §5.1 (product lens); Slice columns dropped.
|
||||||
|
- **claude-design-vs-code.md** + **agent-context.md** digest reconciled.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No engineering semver bump (handbook, docs-only); no code/tests/PPE.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Eligibility:** ELIGIBLE via R2a (anchored on the locked design brief; bare
|
||||||
|
`type/feature` #63 would be R3-ineligible).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Next:** F2 — `wgl-brainstorming --lenses brd|prd` param + per-lens accretion
|
||||||
|
gates (work repo: **dev-claude-plugin**, per brief decomposition). F2–F5 all cite
|
||||||
|
this now-shipped F1 spine.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Deferred decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
|
||||||
|
liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
|
||||||
|
finalize. Empty if none._
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Full-handbook slice sweep (scope).** The brief's F1 item enumerates §3.3/§4.3/
|
||||||
|
GUIDE/TEMPLATE/claude-design-home, but "slice" is load-bearing in README §7
|
||||||
|
(roadmap) and §4 too. Since F1 is the only engineering-touching Feature, I swept
|
||||||
|
all of them for internal consistency rather than leaving §7 contradicting a
|
||||||
|
slice-retired §4.3. Confidence high (forced by the decomposition), logged for
|
||||||
|
visibility.
|
||||||
|
- **INCIDENT (resolved) — cross-app mis-publish foot-gun.** First checkpoint ran
|
||||||
|
`publish-transcript.sh` WITHOUT `--repo`; this session's cwd is the *plugin*
|
||||||
|
worktree (cross-repo F1: work-repo is `engineering`), so the script resolved the
|
||||||
|
app from cwd → `dev-claude-plugin`, published engineering session 0025's
|
||||||
|
placeholder into `dev-claude-plugin/0025/`, and — same-ordinal collision —
|
||||||
|
git-rm'd the REAL finalized `dev-claude-plugin/0025/…2026-06-07…` transcript as a
|
||||||
|
"stale variant", then pushed (342313d). Fixed by `git revert` + push (50076a4),
|
||||||
|
restoring the June-7 record; republished correctly with `--repo engineering`
|
||||||
|
(8fc43ca). **Plugin bug to file:** `publish-transcript.sh` should resolve the app
|
||||||
|
from the transcript's staging path / filename app-subdir (or refuse on a cwd-vs-
|
||||||
|
staging app mismatch), not silently from `$PWD`; and the same-ordinal "stale
|
||||||
|
variant" replacement must be scoped to the SAME app, never cross-app. The init
|
||||||
|
skill's checkpoint guidance should also always pass `--repo` for cross-repo
|
||||||
|
sessions. Flagged via spawn_task.
|
||||||
|
- **`**Design:**` field relocation + plugin lag.** Retiring per-slice §7.2 leaves the
|
||||||
|
shipped `**Design:**` field (consumed by `wgl-design-handoff` + the design-readiness
|
||||||
|
soft gate, which read it per-`--slice`) without a slice home. I relocated it to the
|
||||||
|
SPEC's §5.1 (Product lens), co-located with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision —
|
||||||
|
one SPEC = one design decision. The plugin's `--slice`-grained plumbing
|
||||||
|
(`backfill-spec-design.sh`, `design-readiness.sh`) now lags the docs and needs a
|
||||||
|
downstream reconciliation (candidate: F5 wiring / a follow-up issue). Flagged, not
|
||||||
|
fixed in F1 (docs-lead-automation, §4.1).
|
||||||
@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# Session 0025.0 — Transcript
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> App: engineering
|
|
||||||
> Start: 2026-06-22T07-40 (PST)
|
|
||||||
> Type: planning-and-executing
|
|
||||||
> Posture: yolo
|
|
||||||
> Claude-Session: 3141c3a0-ef70-4f90-9c36-f82858f08d3a
|
|
||||||
> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.**
|
|
||||||
>
|
|
||||||
> This file reserves session ID 0025 for engineering. The driver replaces this
|
|
||||||
> body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final
|
|
||||||
> SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--<end>.md form at session end.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Launch prompt
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
Start F1 of the SDLC pipeline refactor — handbook reconciliation in
|
|
||||||
wiggleverse/engineering (issue #63 on the dev-claude-plugin tracker): §3.3
|
|
||||||
accretion, §4.3 slice-retirement (Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution;
|
|
||||||
Stories become standalone leaf issues, R2(b)), solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE
|
|
||||||
updates, and the documented home of the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision.
|
|
||||||
Source: engineering docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md (decisions locked).
|
|
||||||
It's the docs-lead spine F2–F5 cite — first.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Plan
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> Anchor: design `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` (R2a — locked Solution-Design
|
|
||||||
> brief; eligibility ELIGIBLE). Work repo: `wiggleverse/engineering`. Feature #63 on
|
|
||||||
> the dev-claude-plugin tracker. Branch: `feat/sdlc-f1-handbook-reconciliation`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**F1 — Handbook reconciliation for the staged-gate SDLC pipeline.** Reconcile the
|
|
||||||
canonical engineering docs to the brief's locked decisions. F1 is the *only* Feature
|
|
||||||
touching `engineering` (F2–F5 are dev-claude-plugin), so the full handbook sweep
|
|
||||||
happens here or never — internal consistency is required, not optional.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Deliverables (per brief §F1):
|
|
||||||
1. **§3.3 accretion** (README) — the Solution Design is authored by ACCRETION: each
|
|
||||||
design-track lens (business → product → engineering) is written into the same
|
|
||||||
growing SPEC at its own gated stage; never separate brd.md/prd.md files; one
|
|
||||||
coherent doc `superpowers:writing-plans` consumes. Reframe the Delivery row +
|
|
||||||
traceability row (drop "Slice").
|
|
||||||
2. **§4.3 reconciliation** (README) — Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution;
|
|
||||||
its internal units are the plan's Tasks (not slices/Stories). Feature→Story(slice)
|
|
||||||
sub-layer retired; Stories are STANDALONE leaf issues only (R2(b)). "Slice" is not
|
|
||||||
used (superpowers grain: sub-project / spec / plan / Task / Step). R1–R4 intact.
|
|
||||||
3. **GUIDE/TEMPLATE** — accretion authoring model (replaces "drafted whole, reviewed
|
|
||||||
whole"); §7 Delivery Plan = rollout/launch strategy only (retire §7.2 "Slicing
|
|
||||||
plan" task-checklist; renumber 7.3→7.2, 7.4→7.3); relocate the `**Design:**` field
|
|
||||||
to §5.1 (Product lens, with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision); drop "Slice"
|
|
||||||
columns from traceability + docs tables.
|
|
||||||
4. **Claude-Design-vs-Code home** — keep §5.1 (Product/prd lens) as the documented
|
|
||||||
home; note the decision is authored at the prd-lens stage under accretion.
|
|
||||||
5. **Full slice sweep** across README §4 day-to-day, §7 roadmap, §10, lifecycle tree.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Then: verify (residual-slice grep + internal §7.x ref check) → commit → PR → merge.
|
|
||||||
No engineering version bump (handbook, not a semver'd plugin). No code/tests/PPE
|
|
||||||
(docs-only; the pipeline's E2E/PPE gates don't apply to a prose change).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Deferred decisions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
|
|
||||||
liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
|
|
||||||
finalize. Empty if none._
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Full-handbook slice sweep (scope).** The brief's F1 item enumerates §3.3/§4.3/
|
|
||||||
GUIDE/TEMPLATE/claude-design-home, but "slice" is load-bearing in README §7
|
|
||||||
(roadmap) and §4 too. Since F1 is the only engineering-touching Feature, I swept
|
|
||||||
all of them for internal consistency rather than leaving §7 contradicting a
|
|
||||||
slice-retired §4.3. Confidence high (forced by the decomposition), logged for
|
|
||||||
visibility.
|
|
||||||
- **`**Design:**` field relocation + plugin lag.** Retiring per-slice §7.2 leaves the
|
|
||||||
shipped `**Design:**` field (consumed by `wgl-design-handoff` + the design-readiness
|
|
||||||
soft gate, which read it per-`--slice`) without a slice home. I relocated it to the
|
|
||||||
SPEC's §5.1 (Product lens), co-located with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision —
|
|
||||||
one SPEC = one design decision. The plugin's `--slice`-grained plumbing
|
|
||||||
(`backfill-spec-design.sh`, `design-readiness.sh`) now lags the docs and needs a
|
|
||||||
downstream reconciliation (candidate: F5 wiring / a follow-up issue). Flagged, not
|
|
||||||
fixed in F1 (docs-lead-automation, §4.1).
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user