From 49d7d5787b7ef8d017360f3f700416d1ebfd11df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Stull Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:05:33 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] add engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--2026-06-22T08-05.md + replace placeholder/variant SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md --- ...RIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--2026-06-22T08-05.md | 154 ++++++++++++++++++ ...TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md | 80 --------- 2 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) create mode 100644 engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--2026-06-22T08-05.md delete mode 100644 engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md diff --git a/engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--2026-06-22T08-05.md b/engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--2026-06-22T08-05.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1d25af8 --- /dev/null +++ b/engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--2026-06-22T08-05.md @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +# Session 0025.0 — Transcript + +> App: engineering +> Start: 2026-06-22T07-40 (PST) +> Type: planning-and-executing +> Posture: yolo +> Claude-Session: 3141c3a0-ef70-4f90-9c36-f82858f08d3a +> End: 2026-06-22T08-05 (PST) +> Status: **FINALIZED.** +> +> Cross-repo session: launched from the dev-claude-plugin worktree; work-repo is +> `wiggleverse/engineering` (handbook). Anchor: the locked design brief +> `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` (R2a). + +## Session arc (turn-by-turn) + +1. **Gate + init.** Classified the `/goal` launch as planning-and-executing. + Claimed engineering session 0025 (`--repo engineering`); peeked 4 stale orphan + `--INPROGRESS` placeholders (0009/0017/0021/0024, 9–12d old — not live, noted & + left). Verified clean `main`. Eligibility: ELIGIBLE via R2a on the brief (a + bare `type/feature` #63 is R3-ineligible). +2. **Orientation.** Read the brief (locked decisions) + the current state of + handbook §3.3/§4.3, solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE, claude-design-vs-code.md. + Swept all "slice" usage → found it load-bearing across README §3.3/§4/§4.3/§7/ + §10 + GUIDE/TEMPLATE §7. Resolved scope: F1 is the *only* engineering-touching + Feature (F2–F5 are dev-claude-plugin), so the full handbook sweep happens here + for internal consistency. +3. **INCIDENT (caught + fixed).** First checkpoint ran `publish-transcript.sh` + without `--repo`; cwd-resolution mis-published 0025 into `dev-claude-plugin/` + and git-rm'd a real June-7 transcript on a same-ordinal collision. Reverted + + re-pushed the session-history remote, republished correctly with `--repo`. + Plugin foot-gun flagged via spawn_task (resolve app from staging path, scope + same-ordinal replacement to one app). +4. **Execute.** Reconciled 5 files (README, agent-context digest, GUIDE, + TEMPLATE, claude-design-vs-code) — accretion model, slice-retirement, §7 + restructure + renumber, `**Design:**` field relocation to §5.1. +5. **Verify + ship.** Residual-slice grep (only intentional naming left), table + column + §7.x cross-ref checks. Committed, PR engineering #64, merged to main, + #63 auto-closed, branch deleted, local main synced. +6. **Finalize.** Base survey clean; no plan artifact to archive (prose + reconciliation, not a writing-plans doc); docs-only → no §9 pipeline stage; + memory + transcript. + +The full, uncurated turn-by-turn (every tool call and wrong turn — incl. the +mis-publish) is the session conversation log; this is the protocol record. + +## Launch prompt + +``` +Start F1 of the SDLC pipeline refactor — handbook reconciliation in +wiggleverse/engineering (issue #63 on the dev-claude-plugin tracker): §3.3 +accretion, §4.3 slice-retirement (Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; +Stories become standalone leaf issues, R2(b)), solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE +updates, and the documented home of the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision. +Source: engineering docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md (decisions locked). +It's the docs-lead spine F2–F5 cite — first. + +``` + +## Plan + +> Anchor: design `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` (R2a — locked Solution-Design +> brief; eligibility ELIGIBLE). Work repo: `wiggleverse/engineering`. Feature #63 on +> the dev-claude-plugin tracker. Branch: `feat/sdlc-f1-handbook-reconciliation`. + +**F1 — Handbook reconciliation for the staged-gate SDLC pipeline.** Reconcile the +canonical engineering docs to the brief's locked decisions. F1 is the *only* Feature +touching `engineering` (F2–F5 are dev-claude-plugin), so the full handbook sweep +happens here or never — internal consistency is required, not optional. + +Deliverables (per brief §F1): +1. **§3.3 accretion** (README) — the Solution Design is authored by ACCRETION: each + design-track lens (business → product → engineering) is written into the same + growing SPEC at its own gated stage; never separate brd.md/prd.md files; one + coherent doc `superpowers:writing-plans` consumes. Reframe the Delivery row + + traceability row (drop "Slice"). +2. **§4.3 reconciliation** (README) — Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; + its internal units are the plan's Tasks (not slices/Stories). Feature→Story(slice) + sub-layer retired; Stories are STANDALONE leaf issues only (R2(b)). "Slice" is not + used (superpowers grain: sub-project / spec / plan / Task / Step). R1–R4 intact. +3. **GUIDE/TEMPLATE** — accretion authoring model (replaces "drafted whole, reviewed + whole"); §7 Delivery Plan = rollout/launch strategy only (retire §7.2 "Slicing + plan" task-checklist; renumber 7.3→7.2, 7.4→7.3); relocate the `**Design:**` field + to §5.1 (Product lens, with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision); drop "Slice" + columns from traceability + docs tables. +4. **Claude-Design-vs-Code home** — keep §5.1 (Product/prd lens) as the documented + home; note the decision is authored at the prd-lens stage under accretion. +5. **Full slice sweep** across README §4 day-to-day, §7 roadmap, §10, lifecycle tree. + +Then: verify (residual-slice grep + internal §7.x ref check) → commit → PR → merge. +No engineering version bump (handbook, not a semver'd plugin). No code/tests/PPE +(docs-only; the pipeline's E2E/PPE gates don't apply to a prose change). + +## Outcome + +**F1 shipped.** PR #64 (`feat/sdlc-f1-handbook-reconciliation`) merged to +`engineering/main` at 5054465; Feature **#63** ("Handbook: stage-gate the SDLC +pipeline", engineering tracker) auto-closed via `Fixes #63`. Five files reconciled +(README.md, agent-context.md, solution-design/{GUIDE,TEMPLATE,claude-design-vs-code}.md): ++212/−164. + +- **§3.3** — accretion authoring model; Delivery Plan = rollout/launch strategy, + not a task list. +- **§4.3** — Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; internal units = the + plan's Tasks; Feature→Story→"slice" sub-layer retired; Stories standalone leaf + issues only (R2(b)); "slice" terminology retired. R1–R4 intact. +- **GUIDE/TEMPLATE** — accretion (replaces drafted-whole/reviewed-whole); §7 = rollout/ + launch only (retired §7.2 Slicing plan; renumber 7.3→7.2, 7.4→7.3); `**Design:**` + field relocated to §5.1 (product lens); Slice columns dropped. +- **claude-design-vs-code.md** + **agent-context.md** digest reconciled. + +No engineering semver bump (handbook, docs-only); no code/tests/PPE. + +**Eligibility:** ELIGIBLE via R2a (anchored on the locked design brief; bare +`type/feature` #63 would be R3-ineligible). + +**Next:** F2 — `wgl-brainstorming --lenses brd|prd` param + per-lens accretion +gates (work repo: **dev-claude-plugin**, per brief decomposition). F2–F5 all cite +this now-shipped F1 spine. + +## Deferred decisions + +_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have +liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at +finalize. Empty if none._ + +- **Full-handbook slice sweep (scope).** The brief's F1 item enumerates §3.3/§4.3/ + GUIDE/TEMPLATE/claude-design-home, but "slice" is load-bearing in README §7 + (roadmap) and §4 too. Since F1 is the only engineering-touching Feature, I swept + all of them for internal consistency rather than leaving §7 contradicting a + slice-retired §4.3. Confidence high (forced by the decomposition), logged for + visibility. +- **INCIDENT (resolved) — cross-app mis-publish foot-gun.** First checkpoint ran + `publish-transcript.sh` WITHOUT `--repo`; this session's cwd is the *plugin* + worktree (cross-repo F1: work-repo is `engineering`), so the script resolved the + app from cwd → `dev-claude-plugin`, published engineering session 0025's + placeholder into `dev-claude-plugin/0025/`, and — same-ordinal collision — + git-rm'd the REAL finalized `dev-claude-plugin/0025/…2026-06-07…` transcript as a + "stale variant", then pushed (342313d). Fixed by `git revert` + push (50076a4), + restoring the June-7 record; republished correctly with `--repo engineering` + (8fc43ca). **Plugin bug to file:** `publish-transcript.sh` should resolve the app + from the transcript's staging path / filename app-subdir (or refuse on a cwd-vs- + staging app mismatch), not silently from `$PWD`; and the same-ordinal "stale + variant" replacement must be scoped to the SAME app, never cross-app. The init + skill's checkpoint guidance should also always pass `--repo` for cross-repo + sessions. Flagged via spawn_task. +- **`**Design:**` field relocation + plugin lag.** Retiring per-slice §7.2 leaves the + shipped `**Design:**` field (consumed by `wgl-design-handoff` + the design-readiness + soft gate, which read it per-`--slice`) without a slice home. I relocated it to the + SPEC's §5.1 (Product lens), co-located with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision — + one SPEC = one design decision. The plugin's `--slice`-grained plumbing + (`backfill-spec-design.sh`, `design-readiness.sh`) now lags the docs and needs a + downstream reconciliation (candidate: F5 wiring / a follow-up issue). Flagged, not + fixed in F1 (docs-lead-automation, §4.1). diff --git a/engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md b/engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md deleted file mode 100644 index 4874eb1..0000000 --- a/engineering/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,80 +0,0 @@ -# Session 0025.0 — Transcript - -> App: engineering -> Start: 2026-06-22T07-40 (PST) -> Type: planning-and-executing -> Posture: yolo -> Claude-Session: 3141c3a0-ef70-4f90-9c36-f82858f08d3a -> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.** -> -> This file reserves session ID 0025 for engineering. The driver replaces this -> body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final -> SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--.md form at session end. - -## Launch prompt - -``` -Start F1 of the SDLC pipeline refactor — handbook reconciliation in -wiggleverse/engineering (issue #63 on the dev-claude-plugin tracker): §3.3 -accretion, §4.3 slice-retirement (Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; -Stories become standalone leaf issues, R2(b)), solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE -updates, and the documented home of the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision. -Source: engineering docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md (decisions locked). -It's the docs-lead spine F2–F5 cite — first. - -``` - -## Plan - -> Anchor: design `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` (R2a — locked Solution-Design -> brief; eligibility ELIGIBLE). Work repo: `wiggleverse/engineering`. Feature #63 on -> the dev-claude-plugin tracker. Branch: `feat/sdlc-f1-handbook-reconciliation`. - -**F1 — Handbook reconciliation for the staged-gate SDLC pipeline.** Reconcile the -canonical engineering docs to the brief's locked decisions. F1 is the *only* Feature -touching `engineering` (F2–F5 are dev-claude-plugin), so the full handbook sweep -happens here or never — internal consistency is required, not optional. - -Deliverables (per brief §F1): -1. **§3.3 accretion** (README) — the Solution Design is authored by ACCRETION: each - design-track lens (business → product → engineering) is written into the same - growing SPEC at its own gated stage; never separate brd.md/prd.md files; one - coherent doc `superpowers:writing-plans` consumes. Reframe the Delivery row + - traceability row (drop "Slice"). -2. **§4.3 reconciliation** (README) — Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; - its internal units are the plan's Tasks (not slices/Stories). Feature→Story(slice) - sub-layer retired; Stories are STANDALONE leaf issues only (R2(b)). "Slice" is not - used (superpowers grain: sub-project / spec / plan / Task / Step). R1–R4 intact. -3. **GUIDE/TEMPLATE** — accretion authoring model (replaces "drafted whole, reviewed - whole"); §7 Delivery Plan = rollout/launch strategy only (retire §7.2 "Slicing - plan" task-checklist; renumber 7.3→7.2, 7.4→7.3); relocate the `**Design:**` field - to §5.1 (Product lens, with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision); drop "Slice" - columns from traceability + docs tables. -4. **Claude-Design-vs-Code home** — keep §5.1 (Product/prd lens) as the documented - home; note the decision is authored at the prd-lens stage under accretion. -5. **Full slice sweep** across README §4 day-to-day, §7 roadmap, §10, lifecycle tree. - -Then: verify (residual-slice grep + internal §7.x ref check) → commit → PR → merge. -No engineering version bump (handbook, not a semver'd plugin). No code/tests/PPE -(docs-only; the pipeline's E2E/PPE gates don't apply to a prose change). - -## Deferred decisions - -_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have -liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at -finalize. Empty if none._ - -- **Full-handbook slice sweep (scope).** The brief's F1 item enumerates §3.3/§4.3/ - GUIDE/TEMPLATE/claude-design-home, but "slice" is load-bearing in README §7 - (roadmap) and §4 too. Since F1 is the only engineering-touching Feature, I swept - all of them for internal consistency rather than leaving §7 contradicting a - slice-retired §4.3. Confidence high (forced by the decomposition), logged for - visibility. -- **`**Design:**` field relocation + plugin lag.** Retiring per-slice §7.2 leaves the - shipped `**Design:**` field (consumed by `wgl-design-handoff` + the design-readiness - soft gate, which read it per-`--slice`) without a slice home. I relocated it to the - SPEC's §5.1 (Product lens), co-located with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision — - one SPEC = one design decision. The plugin's `--slice`-grained plumbing - (`backfill-spec-design.sh`, `design-readiness.sh`) now lags the docs and needs a - downstream reconciliation (candidate: F5 wiring / a follow-up issue). Flagged, not - fixed in F1 (docs-lead-automation, §4.1).