update engineering/0019/SESSION-0019.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-10T22-06--INPROGRESS.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -12,10 +12,56 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch prompt
|
||||
|
||||
_(launch prompt not captured at claim time)_
|
||||
`/wgl-capture` — Amend handbook §9/§10 to codify the Phase-1 rollout story:
|
||||
slices merge to main and deploy to PPE continuously (autonomous, including
|
||||
yolo); every PPE deploy stamps a release tag on the deployed ref; the human
|
||||
validates PPE at their own cadence and promotes a validated tag to prod — prod
|
||||
promotion is the single human gate and is never autonomous in Phase 1, even
|
||||
though PPE may have moved past it. Codify fix-forward (no reverts on main for
|
||||
failed PPE validation — prod was never exposed) and the done-vs-shipped
|
||||
distinction (ticket closes at merge+PPE-green; "shipped" is a tag-level fact).
|
||||
|
||||
## Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Capture session (tracked-lite): turn the operator's fully-specified ask into
|
||||
one typed, source-linked Gitea issue on `wiggleverse/engineering`.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Claim transcript 0019 (`--type capture`). Peek showed live in-flight
|
||||
sessions 0009/0017/0018; capture only writes unstaged drafts in `issues/`,
|
||||
so a non-overlapping slug was used instead of worktree isolation.
|
||||
2. Resolve app → engineering is its own content repo; drafts in `issues/`.
|
||||
3. Step 2.5: no unfiled drafts to resume.
|
||||
4. Size-challenge: one ask, a single obvious doc increment needing no design →
|
||||
`type/story`, `priority/P1` (WSJF ≈ 5.5 — the §6.5×§9 ambiguity is live
|
||||
risk for autonomous sessions).
|
||||
5. Draft `issues/phase-1-rollout-story.md` (full §5 template, value check
|
||||
applied), file via `capture-issues.sh`, delete the draft (INV-8).
|
||||
|
||||
## Turn-by-turn arc
|
||||
|
||||
- Claimed 0019; resolved content repo; no resumable drafts.
|
||||
- Grounded the ask against handbook §9 (pipeline) and §10 (rollout
|
||||
mechanics): §9's "prod gated only on green PPE" + §6.5's autonomous "deploy"
|
||||
together leave autonomous prod promotion textually licensed — the gap the
|
||||
ask closes.
|
||||
- Authored the draft in one pass (story = terse leaf profile; operator not
|
||||
present mid-session), value check green: pain = live ambiguity +
|
||||
hand-policing cost, not "doc missing".
|
||||
- Ensured labels (all existed). **Filed as engineering#43**:
|
||||
https://git.wiggleverse.org/wiggleverse/engineering/issues/43
|
||||
(`type/story`, `priority/P1`).
|
||||
- Deleted the filed draft; `issues/` clean, no stragglers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deferred decisions
|
||||
|
||||
_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
|
||||
liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
|
||||
finalize. Empty if none._
|
||||
- **Self-approved the draft before filing (INV-1) under yolo posture.** The
|
||||
operator launched `/wgl-capture` with a fully-specified ask and was not
|
||||
present mid-session to review the draft blocks; per §6.5
|
||||
autonomous-by-default ("create/approve … without pausing") I treated the
|
||||
opening prompt as the approval and filed engineering#43 without a per-block
|
||||
review pause. If the issue body misses the intent, edit #43 directly —
|
||||
Gitea is the system of record.
|
||||
- **Typed it `type/story` rather than `type/task`.** Judgment call: a
|
||||
handbook policy codification has independent business value (it changes how
|
||||
every autonomous session behaves), so story over task; it needs no design,
|
||||
so not a feature.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user