3062c8c537
On-behalf-of: Ben Stull <ben.stull>
20 lines
754 B
Markdown
20 lines
754 B
Markdown
---
|
|
slug: epistemicauthority
|
|
title: Epistemic Authority
|
|
state: super-draft
|
|
id: null
|
|
repo: null
|
|
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
|
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
|
graduated_at: null
|
|
graduated_by: null
|
|
owners:
|
|
- ben.stull
|
|
arbiters: []
|
|
tags:
|
|
- governance
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
When the system and a Human disagree about reality — did the payment settle, was the item as described, who is right in a dispute — whose account counts? This RFC applies OHM's commitment to the Human as the authority on their own life to commerce, including the deliberate, argued exceptions where a human claim is demoted (for example, 'shown is not settled' demotes a buyer's claim to have paid). Those exceptions must be principled and narrow, not a general license to override the person.
|
|
|