Propose: Epistemic Authority #18
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: epistemicauthority
|
||||
title: Epistemic Authority
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- governance
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
When the system and a Human disagree about reality — did the payment settle, was the item as described, who is right in a dispute — whose account counts? This RFC applies OHM's commitment to the Human as the authority on their own life to commerce, including the deliberate, argued exceptions where a human claim is demoted (for example, 'shown is not settled' demotes a buyer's claim to have paid). Those exceptions must be principled and narrow, not a general license to override the person.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user