Compare commits
28 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3693853973 | |||
| 19ace99dbd | |||
| 6f69ea8c52 | |||
| 85701bbb79 | |||
| 010f2fdc4c | |||
| f4e2ba0f67 | |||
| 28fc969f01 | |||
| 4597fedf9e | |||
| 908b3800c1 | |||
| 759f63e4a7 | |||
| 373a29f336 | |||
| d795019a6d | |||
| 52a0636a4f | |||
| 0aee4fd308 | |||
| 9202ea7d9a | |||
| e29e01d76c | |||
| 48dc37994c | |||
| 7b81dcb5b5 | |||
| 3062c8c537 | |||
| f50faf3151 | |||
| 21cf625613 | |||
| a37262c9c5 | |||
| c5a8cbf4ba | |||
| 1d1881f6b7 | |||
| 046e831e76 | |||
| 854b508399 | |||
| ef50262df3 | |||
| 73ed98a2c5 |
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: agencyantimanipulation
|
||||
title: Agency & Anti-Manipulation
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ethics
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
A Human's Agency is only real if the platform refrains from manipulating the choices it presents. This RFC draws the line between legitimate persuasion and manipulation — no dark patterns, no drip pricing, no manufactured urgency, no lock-in disguised as a reward — as a first-class commitment derived from RFC-0001's Agency. It is the most direct expression of building for humans rather than for extraction.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: cart-order
|
||||
title: Cart & Order
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- commerce
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
An order is commonly modeled as the end of a conversion funnel; in OHM it is a mutual commitment between a buyer and a seller. This RFC defines Cart and Order as that commitment — what each party is promising the other — rather than as a metric to be maximized. It serves Relationality and grounds fulfillment, refunds, and disputes.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: dignitycommerce
|
||||
title: Dignity in Commerce
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ethics
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Buyers and merchants alike can be treated by a platform as means rather than as people — in collections, in disputes, in fees, in failure states. This RFC establishes the floor of Dignity below which no commerce mechanic may push any Human. It is the baseline that the other ethical concepts refine and that every mechanic must clear.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: dutyofcare
|
||||
title: Duty of Care & Vulnerability
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ethics
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Some Humans are vulnerable — in financial distress, elderly, or minors — and the platform's money mechanics (stored value, breakage, balance-parking discounts) are exactly the ones that can prey on them. This RFC defines a duty of care toward vulnerability as a first-class commitment, so the sharpest edges of the credit model are watched rather than ignored. It serves Dignity and care, building on Agency and Dignity in Commerce.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: epistemicauthority
|
||||
title: Epistemic Authority
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- governance
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
When the system and a Human disagree about reality — did the payment settle, was the item as described, who is right in a dispute — whose account counts? This RFC applies OHM's commitment to the Human as the authority on their own life to commerce, including the deliberate, argued exceptions where a human claim is demoted (for example, 'shown is not settled' demotes a buyer's claim to have paid). Those exceptions must be principled and narrow, not a general license to override the person.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: flourishing
|
||||
title: Human Flourishing (The Optimization Target)
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ethics
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Every platform optimizes for something; when that target is left implicit it silently becomes engagement, GMV, or time-on-site, and the mechanics follow it into harm. This RFC makes the optimization target explicit and contestable: what does this platform actually steer toward for the Humans in it? It is the affirmative answer the other ethical concepts are in service of, and every ranking, default, and notification cadence should be traceable back to it.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: fulfillment-inventory
|
||||
title: Fulfillment & Inventory
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- commerce
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Once an order is a mutual commitment, fulfillment is the keeping of that promise and inventory is its honest basis. This RFC defines Fulfillment and Inventory so that availability is real and shipping is represented truthfully, not optimistically. It protects the trust the Commercial Relationship depends on.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: nonextraction
|
||||
title: Non-Extraction
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ethics
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
A platform may need to capture value to survive, but the moment it sustains itself by extracting from the very Humans it serves, it has betrayed them. This RFC defines Non-Extraction as the structural commitment that separates this platform from the Shopify-style model of referral fees, payment markups, and sponsored placement. It is the load-bearing claim behind 'better for owners and customers,' and it makes that claim checkable rather than rhetorical.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: participants
|
||||
title: 'Participants: Customer, Merchant, Operator'
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- commerce
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Every commerce interaction involves Humans in distinct roles — the Customer, the Merchant, and the Operator who runs the platform — and the power between them is unequal. This RFC defines these roles as Humans-in-role (a legal entity such as an LLC is not a Human but is controlled by one), and names the power asymmetry plainly: the Operator holds deploy, data, and float power over everyone else. Naming that asymmetry is what lets later RFCs constrain it; the concept serves Agency and Dignity.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: platform-sustainability
|
||||
title: Platform Sustainability
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- governance
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Non-Extraction is only credible if there is a concrete, legitimate way for the platform to stay alive. This RFC names those sources — avoided card fees, yield on safeguarded float, and breakage — and explicitly rules out referral fees, ad markups, and payment surcharges. It is the enforcement partner of Non-Extraction: how the platform funds itself without betraying the people it serves.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: price
|
||||
title: Price
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- commerce
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Price is where a platform most easily deceives — through hidden fees, drip pricing, and surprise charges at the end. This RFC defines Price as honest and all-in: the number a Human sees is the number that governs the exchange. It serves Agency and Wise Speech, and underpins the load and checkout mechanics.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: privacydataminimization
|
||||
title: Privacy & Data Minimization
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ethics
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
A Human has an interior life and the standing to keep most of it private; a platform that hoovers up data treats the person as a resource to be mined. This RFC commits the platform to knowing only what the exchange genuinely requires and no more — surveillance is not the business model. It serves Interiority and Dignity, and sets the default against which every data-collecting mechanic must justify itself.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: product-listing
|
||||
title: Product & Listing
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- commerce
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
A product listing is the platform's representation of a real good to a real buyer, and it can either inform or mislead. This RFC defines Product and Listing in terms of what they honestly offer the buyer rather than by their conversion potential. It builds on Wise Speech and the Commercial Relationship to keep the catalog truthful.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: wisespeechcommerce
|
||||
title: Wise Speech in Commerce
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ethics
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Listings, prices, and reviews are speech the platform either keeps honest or lets deceive. This RFC applies OHM's foundational Wise Speech value to commerce: descriptions that are truthful, prices that do not mislead, and a platform that does not amplify deceptive speech for its own gain. It protects a Human's ability to choose on the basis of true information.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user