11 KiB
Session 0035.0 — Transcript
Date: 2026-05-28 Goal: OHM roadmap driver, parallel-safe. Pick up unblocked work; the launch handoff named two fallback options if nothing was unblocked.
Outcome: Shipped flotilla v1.3.0 — a read-only
webhookverb that formalizes the manual org-wide Gitea-hook sweep Session 0034 ran by hand. Verified live against OHM (clean). No rfc-app release, no OHM deploy (operator-tool code). Recorded that the other fallback option — the email-hygiene proposal — was already superseded by rfc-app v0.18.0.Highlights:
- flotilla
webhook expect/unexpect/expected/list/check(SPEC §11.5, §12.1, §13.8); newgitea.py+webhooks.py; migration 005.- Live
webhook check --org: clean, 6 repos swept, no strays; reproduced 0034's findings (ohm-meta hook present,ben/ohm-rfc403→not-inspectable).- 203 tests green (19 new). Merged to main, tagged v1.3.0, pushed.
Launch prompt
OHM roadmap driver, parallel-safe. Claim ID first; read SESSION-PROTOCOL §7
+ ohm-rfc/ROADMAP.md; verify live state. STATE (end of 0034): OHM live at
v0.29.0, flotilla v1.2.0, feature arc #26–#29 done. Most feature items
blocked (#21A/#20B date-gated ~06-04; #22 counsel; #31b screenshots;
#33/#34 operator-led). If nothing's unblocked, two clean options: (1) build
the flotilla webhook list/check verb (runbook §19.2 #4 — pure-flotilla,
formalizes the manual hook sweep this session did by hand; needs a small
"expected hook set" design call; flotilla v1.3.0); (2) the framework-side
email-hygiene minor in ohm-infra/RFC-APP-EMAIL-HYGIENE-PROPOSAL.md. Hard
rules unchanged.
Plan
- Claim session ID (0035), read SESSION-PROTOCOL §7 + ROADMAP.
- Verify live state (pin, health, flotilla version).
- Decide between the two fallback options.
- Build flotilla
webhookverb: schema + registry CRUD + gitea client + inspection/drift + CLI + tests. - Bump to v1.3.0; SPEC/CHANGELOG; live-verify; merge/tag/push.
- Cross-repo coherence (ROADMAP #18, runbook note).
- Finalize + publish transcript.
Pre-session state
- OHM live: v0.29.0, healthy (
{"version":"0.29.0","status":"ok"}), deploys.id=40, atohm.wiggleverse.org. - ohm-rfc pin (
ben/ohm-rfc/.rfc-app-version):0.29.0. Tipec4ff4d. - flotilla: v1.2.0,
mainatef34ffe. Clean working tree but for an untracked.claude/(session tooling) + a stray leftover worktree.claude/worktrees/agent-ab800baf41f74f86d/from a prior session. - Active sessions in the shared history repo at claim time: 0026 and
0027 (both
--INPROGRESS, claimed 13-46). Treated as stale/abandoned (their substantive work — the audit-0026 hardening pins — already landed); no overlap with this session's pure-flotilla surface.
Turn-by-turn arc
Arc 1 — Claim + orient
Claimed session 0035 via claim-session-id.sh (push accepted at
1795030). Read SESSION-PROTOCOL §7 (the claim/finalize/publish
discipline) and ROADMAP.md end-to-end, including the version-target table
and operating instructions.
Verified live state: pin 0.29.0, health ok, flotilla v1.2.0. Confirmed the date-gated items (#21A/#20B, ~06-04) are still blocked (today is 05-28), #22 needs counsel, #31b needs operator screenshots, #33/#34 are operator-led. So the active-wave fallback applied: pick one of the two named options.
Arc 2 — Choosing between the two options
Read both option docs:
- Option 2 (email-hygiene minor) —
RFC-APP-EMAIL-HYGIENE-PROPOSAL.mdwas authored by Session 0013 (M.3) before #18/#20 shipped. Its three surfaces — thebuild_envelopehardened-header helper, theoutbound_emailsaudit table, and webhook-handler mandatory-secret — all already landed in rfc-app v0.18.0 (per the #18/#20 version-target rows). The proposal is largely superseded; only a webhook replay-window remnant remains. Not clean. - Option 1 (flotilla webhook verb) — pure-flotilla, in this repo, no
deploy, no new operator secret (the
GITEA_BOT_TOKENis already bound), parallel-safe (no other active flotilla session), and directly formalizes the manual sweep 0034 did by hand. Clean.
Chose Option 1. Recorded the Option-2-is-stale finding as a memory
(project_email_hygiene_superseded.md) so a future handoff doesn't
re-pick it.
Arc 3 — The "expected hook set" design call
The launch prompt flagged a "small expected hook set design call." Grounded it in the code + reality rather than blocking on the operator (all sub-decisions were determined by existing principles):
- Where the expected set lives → the §13 deployment record, not the
CLI (the two-layer rule). Confirmed by reality: OHM's hook is on
wiggleverse/ohm-meta, but the deployment'scorpus_repo/pin_source_repoare bothben/ohm-rfc— so the expected hook cannot be derived from existing fields; it must be declared. - Read-only vs auto-fix → read-only in v1.3.0, mirroring §9's "report
loudly, never auto-rollback." An auto-remediate
webhook applyis a §19.2 candidate. - Inspection set → expected-hook repos ∪
corpus_repo∪pin_source_repo, with--orgextending to every repo underGITEA_ORG(the full 0034 sweep).
Arc 4 — Implementation
- Migration 005 (
expected_webhookstable: repo, url, events, active), registryExpectedWebhook+set/unset/list_expected_webhook(s), mirroring thesecret_refs/overlay_entriesshape. gitea.py— authenticated read client:Authorization: token, reusingpin.py's certifi SSL context + UA.list_repo_hooks+ paginatedlist_org_repos. 401/403 →GiteaAuthError.webhooks.py— resolvesGITEA_URL/GITEA_ORGfrom the overlay and readsGITEA_BOT_TOKENtransiently from Secret Manager (never persisted, §3 invariant 1);inspection_set,inspect_repos(per-repo 403 tolerated →not inspectable, doesn't abort the sweep),check_drift(missing/unexpected/mismatch/uninspectable; an un-inspectable repo with no expectation is a warning, not a hard finding).- CLI —
webhook expect/unexpect/expected/list/check,--jsonon read verbs,--orgon list/check, non-zero exit on drift. - Tests —
test_webhook.py, 19 cases (registry CRUD, drift matrix, hook parsing, full CLI surface with Gitea + Secret-Manager monkeypatched).
Arc 5 — Docs, release, live verification
- SPEC §11.5 (the authenticated webhook read surface + read-only stance),
§12.1 verb inventory, §13.8 (OHM's expected set). CHANGELOG 1.3.0 with an
RFC-2119
Upgrade steps:block. - VERSION + pyproject → 1.3.0.
- Seeded OHM's expected hook into the live flotilla DB:
webhook expect ohm-rfc-app wiggleverse/ohm-meta https://ohm.wiggleverse.org/api/webhooks/gitea. - Live verification (read-only GETs against
git.wiggleverse.org):webhook list:wiggleverse/ohm-meta #2present + active with 12 events;ben/ohm-rfc→not inspectable (HTTP 403)— exactly 0034's finding.webhook check: OK (exit 0), scoped (2 repos) and--org(6 repos, no strays).
- 203 tests green. Committed
fb9bd04, FF-merged tomain, tagged v1.3.0, pushedmain+ tag to origin. Deleted the feature branch. - Caught + unstaged a stray
.claude/worktrees/...embedded repo before committing; added.claude/to.gitignore.
Arc 6 — Cross-repo coherence
- ohm-rfc ROADMAP #18 row: appended the v1.3.0 webhook-verb tooling
note. Committed
02d22fe, pushed to origin. - ohm-infra
EMAIL-AND-WEBHOOK-HARDENING-RUNBOOK.md: annotated the operator-execution sequence to point the by-hand sweep at the new verb. (ohm-infra is not a git repo — local operational reference only.)
Cut state (end of session)
| flotilla | main @ fb9bd04, tag v1.3.0 pushed to origin. webhook verb shipped. |
| ohm-rfc | main @ 02d22fe (ROADMAP #18 tooling note), pushed. Pin unchanged at 0.29.0. |
| ohm-infra | runbook annotated (local, uncommitted — not a git repo). |
| OHM live | deploys.id=40, v0.29.0, healthy. Unchanged — no deploy this session. |
| flotilla live DB | OHM expected-webhook seeded; webhook check OK. |
| Ledger | Status |
|---|---|
flotilla v1.3.0 webhook verb (#18 runbook follow-up) |
✅ shipped + live-verified |
| Option 2 (email-hygiene minor) | ⏸ not picked — already superseded by rfc-app v0.18.0 |
§19.2 candidates surfaced
webhook apply(auto-remediate). v1.3.0 is read-only. A future verb could create a missing expected hook or delete a stray one (with theGITEA_WEBHOOK_SECRETwired into the created hook's config). Deferred until drift-by-hand becomes the bottleneck; carries write-risk that wants the same care assecret set.- Event-list assertion. OHM's expected hook is declared with
events=*(URL + active + presence checked, exact event list not asserted). Tightening to an explicit comma-list would catch event drift but needs the operator to settle the canonical event set.
What lands on the operator's plate
- Nothing blocking. v1.3.0 is a local operator-tool release; no deploy, no secret, no pin bump.
- Optional: verify the
ben.stull/ohm-rfchook by hand (Gitea web UI) — the bot can't read it (403), sowebhook checkreports itnot inspectablerather than confirming it. This is runbook #4, still an operator self-check. - Optional: decide whether to tighten OHM's expected hook to an explicit event list (§19.2 candidate 2 above).
Prompt the operator can paste into the next Claude Code session
OHM roadmap driver, parallel-safe. Claim your own ID first (advisory only);
read ohm-infra/SESSION-PROTOCOL §7 + ohm-rfc/ROADMAP.md; verify live state.
STATE (end of 0035): OHM live at v0.29.0 (deploys.id=40, healthy), ohm-rfc
pin 0.29.0, flotilla now v1.3.0. Session 0035 shipped the flotilla webhook
list/check verb (pure-flotilla, no deploy) and live-verified it — the org
hook posture is clean.
Most feature items still blocked: #21A / #20B date-gated (~06-04, so likely
unblocked NOW or within days if it's on/after 06-04 — check the date and the
DMARC rua data); #22 needs operator-drafted + counsel-reviewed copy; #31b
needs operator screenshots; #33/#34 operator-led.
If #21A (Amplitude deep audit — needs ~1wk of v0.15.0 data) or #20B (email
deliverability follow-up — needs ~1wk of DMARC p=none rua data) is now
date-unblocked, that's the cleanest feature work. Otherwise check the
ROADMAP for anything newly shippable. Do NOT re-pick the email-hygiene
proposal (RFC-APP-EMAIL-HYGIENE-PROPOSAL.md) — its content already shipped
in rfc-app v0.18.0 (see the #18/#20 rows + the memory).
Hard rules unchanged: never ask for secret bytes; transcript is the final
step; deliver the next handoff in chat before publishing.