Files
session-history/dev-claude-plugin/0054/SESSION-0054.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-10T08-24--2026-06-10T10-17.md

6.5 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Session 0054.0 — Transcript

App: dev-claude-plugin Start: 2026-06-10T08-24 (PST) End: 2026-06-10T10-17 (PST) Type: brainstorming Claude-Session: a23043e5-f4ca-4e1e-85db-bc7864ffd313 Status: FINALIZED

Launch prompt

Let's brainstorm the solution design for #78 — canonical issue-type taxonomy definition (the unblocker of Epic #77; promote the proposals/capture-phase RFC §4 sizing test to canonical handbook practice), then #79 (validation automation, blocked by #78)

Pre-state

  • Repo wiggleverse-dev-claude-plugin on main (origin/main @ e2e031a / 0.42.0 at claim; advanced to 0.44.0 under concurrent sessions by finalize). Session loaded plugin 0.37.0 (cache lag, ~7 versions behind — flagged at start).
  • Claim-peek showed three live concurrent sessions (0035/0048/0053) → mandatory worktree isolation.
  • Anchors: Epic #77 ⊃ Feature #78 (taxonomy definition) → Feature #79 (validation). #78 R1-eligible (type/feature). Source material: the Capture RFC §4 sizing test on the unmerged engineering branch proposals/capture-phase (4 types); wgl-capture Step 4 + #64 already use 5 (adds type/bug).

The arc

  1. Gate + claim. SessionStart gate classified the prompt as brainstorming (≥90%) → wgl-brainstorming. Claimed session 0054 (--type brainstorming). Set up the mandatory isolated worktree wiggleverse-dev-claude-plugin-session-0054 (branch session-0054, off origin/main) — the canonical checkout was on a dirty concurrent-session branch, so isolation was doubly right.
  2. Orient. Read issues #77/#78/#79; ran the R1 eligibility gate (#78 ELIGIBLE). Extracted the RFC §4.1 sizing test verbatim (Explore agent), the #64 design (specs/2026-06-10-issue-type-design-gates-design.md), the solution-design TEMPLATE/GUIDE, and the handbook structure. Key finding: the #64 spec's §4.4 prescribed a handbook subsection ("Required up-front design scales with issue type") that was never written — so capture/#64's "canonical in the handbook" pointers were dangling.
  3. Two framing decisions (AskUserQuestion). D1: right-sized non-software Solution Design (operational plan replaces §§37). D2: co-locate the taxonomy with the missing #64 gate in one handbook §4.3.
  4. Authored §1 (Business Context) section-by-section, committed to the session branch, rendered URL for review.
  5. Detour — the content-repo split. Operator: "specs should always be in *-content. Move the specs dir over there and update the wgl brainstorming skill." Investigated: app.json declared the plugin as its own content repo (no *-content existed). Asked scope (AskUserQuestion) → split out a content repo. Operator created wiggleverse-dev-claude-plugin-content. I: migrated specs/ + plans/ into it (the whole content role); rewired app.json (content+spec-rfc → new repo; plugin keeps code/documentation/bdd); updated wgl-brainstorming to author specs in the content repo; git rm'd the collections; bumped 0.42.0→0.43.0; lint-clean; PR #94 merged. Verified resolve-app.py now points CONTENT_/SPEC_RFC_ at the new repo.
  6. Resumed #78 in the content repo: re-homed §1, then authored §2 Solution Proposal, §37 Operational Plan (the §4.3 content: 5 types, sizing cascade, co-located #64 gate, worked boundary examples, consumer re-pointing table, RFC disposition, sequencing), §810.
  7. UI Design gate (R4), iterated with the operator:
    • Operator: incorporate UI Design — a UI-bearing Solution Design requires a UI Design before plan/implement. Added R4 (gate-rule-only; mechanics deferred).
    • Operator: it applies to any issue type when UI changes exceed the design system → implementation blocked. Generalized R4 (decoupled from Feature/Solution-Design; trigger = "beyond the design system").
    • Operator: the design system exists, placement handled in a parallel session → recorded as D7 (referenced, not defined here).
    • Operator proposed enforcement = abort implementation planning when UI surfaces with no UI Design and the design system is insufficient → adopted as D8 (planning-time abort-with-override, same shape as #64/D3).
  8. Approve + merge + lock. Marked the spec approved / v1.0.0, opened+merged content PR #1 (session-0054 → main). Locked Q1 placement → §4.3 (D9) via content PR #2.

Outcomes (what landed)

  • NEW content repo wiggleverse/wiggleverse-dev-claude-plugin-content holding the app's specs/ + plans/ collections.
  • Plugin PR #94 → 0.43.0: the specs-split refactor (app.json rewire, wgl-brainstorming clarification, collections removed).
  • #78 Solution Design GRADUATED (content repo, v1.0.1; content PRs #1+#2; submit-spec.sh --status graduated stamped the frontmatter at finalize).
  • Filed #98 (type/feature) — the Q2 follow-up: UI Design artifact + R4 enforcement build.
  • Plugin pin made live 0.37.0 → 0.44.0 via update-plugin.sh.

Deferred decisions

None — every substantive call (D1D9) was made with the operator live via AskUserQuestion or explicit direction.

Decisions log (carried in the spec §9)

D1 non-software shape · D2 co-locate taxonomy + #64 gate · D3 reword #64 INV-6 / mark §4.4 fulfilled · D4 UI Design gate-rule-only · D5 leave the RFC, add a supersession note · D6 R4 applies to any type, trigger = beyond the design system · D7 design system exists (placement = parallel work) · D8 R4 enforced as a planning-time abort-with-override · D9 placement = handbook §4.3.

Cut state

  • main (plugin) @ 0.44.0; content repo main @ 2d62b81 (graduated #78 spec).
  • Session worktree session-0054 (plugin) torn down; local stale branches deleted.
  • Open follow-ups on the tracker: #78 (design done; §4.3 implementation is a downstream planning session), #98 (UI Design + R4 build), #79 (next).
  • Untracked docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-09-wgl-capture-mvp-design.pdf left in the plugin tree (predates this session; not mine).

Next-session prompt

/goal Explore #79 (validate type/* vs the work shape at create & triage) and write its Solution-Design spec — the validation half of Epic #77, unblocked by #78

The enforcement seam (webhook / inert Gitea Action / LLM-judge / capture-side self-check) is the central decision; #78's handbook §4.3 is the canonical definition #79 validates against. Authored in the content repo per the 0054 split.