# Session 0055.0 — Transcript

> App: dev-claude-plugin
> Start: 2026-06-10T07-30 (PST)
> End: 2026-06-10T08-55 (PST)
> Type: planning-and-executing
> Claude-Session: 38babc14-edde-44a0-8d73-40b05acc1154
> Goal: process the open plugin-feedback issues; the pass grew into four shipped
>       releases (0.39.0 → 0.42.0) plus a scope fold-in on #78.
> Outcome: SHIPPED 0.39.0 (PR #81), 0.40.0 (PR #86), 0.41.0 (PR #87), 0.42.0
>          (PR #88); folded the feedback-taxonomy question into #78 (comment #1099).

> **Note on tracking.** This session opened via `/wgl-dev-plugin-review-feedback`
> (the review skill — explicitly NOT a gate lifter, claims no transcript). It is
> tracked retroactively at finalize because it **shipped four releases**, which the
> handbook's driver-session rule (§6) says requires a published transcript. The ID
> was claimed at finalize, not at start.

## Plan

The work was emergent, not pre-planned — a feedback-review pass that the operator
steered into a sequence of four self-contained changes, each shipped on its own
branch → PR → merge → version bump:

1. Triage the untriaged feedback issues (#76, #45, #44) → ship the fixes.
2. Rename the feedback skill pair to align with `wgl-capture`.
3. Add an explicit `feedback` marker label to de-conflate the shared tracker.
4. Make the review skill route by issue type instead of blind-implementing.
5. Fold the leftover taxonomy question into the in-flight #78.

## Pre-session state

- Plugin at 0.38.0 on `main` (session 0051's ship, merge `33ffd49`).
- A SessionStart notice reported 3 untriaged plugin-feedback issues; the running
  session loaded plugin cache **0.37.0** (a known cache-lag the notice flagged).
- Heavy concurrency: sessions 0035/0048/0052/0053/0054 in flight on the canonical
  checkout (§5.4 territory). This session worked **in-place** on the canonical
  checkout (no worktree) and hit two sync collisions, both resolved non-destructively.

## Turn-by-turn arc

### 1 — Feedback review pass → 0.39.0 (PR #81)

Listed untriaged issues — found **#76, #45, #44** (the SessionStart notice's count
of 3 was right). Read each in full. Triage:
- **#76** (capture leaks implementation into business sections) → real, doc-shaped,
  self-contained → **act now**.
- **#45** (hook hardening: timeouts, notice sanitization, matcher gap, silent-exit,
  find pruning) → five surgical fixes, all specified → **act now**.
- **#44** (extract shared `gitea-issues-lib.sh`) → larger refactor whose own Scope
  says it "lands after the two surgical bug fixes"; prerequisites unlanded →
  **defer (`accepted`)**.

Implemented #76 (type-conditional "Business altitude by type" rule in
`capture-quality.md` + value-check item + anti-patterns + type-aware Acceptance/
Decomposition guidance; referenced from `wgl-capture` Step 5) and #45 (all five
hardenings: `hooks.json` timeouts; `jq -n --arg` JSON in patchwatch/feedback
notices closing the control-char + remote-title injection gap; matcher
`Edit|Write` → `Edit|Write|MultiEdit|NotebookEdit` + corrected wrapper comment;
`session-start` silent-exit on missing gate file; `ohm-presence-notice` find
prune). Bumped 0.38.0 → **0.39.0**, lint clean, verified hooks emit valid JSON
(jq path preserves a 0x01 control char the old escaper dropped). Shipped PR #81
(merge `1b28bd1`). Advanced lifecycle: #76/#45 → `done`, #44 → `accepted`.

Surfaced mid-pass: **four new untriaged issues #77–#80** appeared (concurrent
capture cluster). Left them; flagged as design-gated.

### 2 — Operator Q: is there a feedback marker label?

Investigated. Answer: **no.** `file-feedback.sh` stamps only `type:*`/`severity:*`;
`list-feedback.sh` treats *every* tracker issue as feedback. That assumption broke
when the plugin became its own content repo (0.27.0) and `wgl-capture` began filing
backlog (`type/*` + `priority/*`) on the same tracker — so the review queue
conflated the two families (why #44/#45/#77–#79 looked like feedback). Recommended
an explicit `feedback` marker. (Sharp illustration: #45/#44 carry slash `type/*` —
they were capture-filed backlog I'd mistakenly triaged as feedback.)

### 3 — Rename the feedback skills → 0.40.0 (PR #86)

Operator: rename to align with `wgl-capture`. Flagged that the literal name drops
the `wgl-` prefix all 13 skills share, and that the sibling review skill would be
left behind. Asked (AskUserQuestion) → operator chose **"symmetric pair"**:
- `wgl-dev-plugin-feedback` → `capture-dev-claude-plugin-feedback`
- `wgl-dev-plugin-review-feedback` → `review-dev-claude-plugin-feedback`

`git mv` both dirs + updated every **live** reference (SKILL `name:` + slash
triggers, CLAUDE.md, README, feedback/README, TOKENS.md, wgl-remediate, the two
design **specs**). **Left the two dated `docs/superpowers/plans/` verbatim** —
archived records of commands run 2026-06-07; rewriting them would falsify the
archive. Bumped → **0.40.0**, PR #86 (merge `1ff2da6`). Sync collision #1: a
concurrent capture session had committed 3 `issues/issue-type-*.md` drafts to
origin/main matching my untracked copies — verified byte-identical, removed local
copies, ff-pulled.

### 4 — Implement the marker label → 0.41.0 (PR #87)

Operator gave the 4-item spec. Implemented: `feedback` added to
`ensure-feedback-labels.sh`; `file-feedback.sh` always applies it; `list-feedback.sh`
requires it (`?labels=feedback` + client-side jq); **companion fix** —
`hooks/feedback-notice` scopes its counts to the marker so the session-start notice
stops over-counting backlog; README + both skill bodies updated. **Backfill (live
API):** classified all 47 tracker issues by label shape (colon = feedback, slash =
backlog) → marked the **14** genuine feedback issues, skipped 33 backlog.
`list-feedback --untriaged` went from leaking backlog to a clean 5 real issues.
(Discriminator note: #80 IS feedback (colon) but siblings #77/#78/#79 are backlog
(slash).) Bumped → **0.41.0**, PR #87 (merge `d94f6ac`).

### 5 — Mid-work operator directive → review routes by type → 0.42.0 (PR #88)

Operator (sent while I was mid-marker-work): the review skill should **never just
implement** — apply the appropriate `type/*` tag, then route: epic/feature →
brainstorming (next step a new session); story/task/bug → recommend + implement on
approval. Finished the marker task first, then encoded this into
`review-dev-claude-plugin-feedback/SKILL.md`: replaced the stale "direct
triage-and-fix" note with the routing principle (citing handbook §3.4 +
`check-issue-eligibility.sh`), rewrote Step 3 (classify-and-route), scoped Step 4
to approved leaf fixes, updated lifecycle summary / Quick reference / Common
mistakes; `feedback/README.md` lifecycle documents it. Bumped → **0.42.0**, PR #88
(merge `e2e031a`).

### 6 — Fold the taxonomy question into #78

Flagged the open coupling: feedback now carries a colon `type:*` *nature* label AND
(via routing) a slash `type/*` *work-shape* label — dual-type awkwardness that the
in-flight #77/#78/#79 "issue type is a validated contract" cluster is meant to
unify. Operator: **fold it into #78.** Posted a structured scope comment to #78
(**comment #1099**) framing the decision (one-canonical-axis-for-all vs
two-orthogonal-axes) + the consumers to re-point if unified. Non-destructive (no
body rewrite — #78 is session 0052's captured spec).

### 7 — Finalize (this gesture)

Operator: finalize. Surveyed clean. Pin already live at 0.42.0 (session 0053's
finalize did the cache-lag update). Memory updated throughout. Claimed 0055 and
published this transcript (driver session — four releases shipped).

## Cut state (end of session)

- Branch `main` clean (only the pre-existing untracked operator PDF + concurrent
  sessions' `issues/triage-*.md` drafts, left untouched).
- Plugin **0.42.0** on `main`; enabled pin already 0.42.0 (made live by 0053).
- Shipped this session (all merged, branches deleted):
  | release | PR | merge SHA | what |
  | --- | --- | --- | --- |
  | 0.39.0 | #81 | `1b28bd1` | #76 capture business-altitude + #45 hook hardening |
  | 0.40.0 | #86 | `1ff2da6` | rename feedback pair → capture-/review- |
  | 0.41.0 | #87 | `d94f6ac` | `feedback` marker label + backfill (14 issues) |
  | 0.42.0 | #88 | `e2e031a` | review routes by issue type, never blind-implements |
- Issue lifecycle: #76/#45 `done`; #44 `accepted`; 14 feedback issues backfilled
  with `feedback`; #78 gained scope comment #1099.

## What lands on the operator's plate

- **Re-install** to make 0.40.0–0.42.0's slash-command renames + queue filtering
  live in a *running* session (the enabled pin is 0.42.0, so a restart/`/clear`
  loads it for new sessions).
- **Deferred decisions** (low-confidence calls made without operator input):
  1. Stamped this session `planning-and-executing` (it opened untracked via the
     review skill) — chosen as the honest "coding work" type; no plan artifact, so
     the addendum was skipped.
  2. During the rename, left the two dated `docs/superpowers/plans/` verbatim
     (archive integrity) while updating the design **specs** — a specs-yes/plans-no
     split, not a blanket rewrite.
  3. Backfill discriminator = label *shape* (colon `type:`/`severity:` = feedback;
     slash = backlog). #44/#45 fell out as backlog despite my earlier triaging them
     as feedback — they keep their resolution labels but no marker, so they leave
     the queue. Judged correct (they were never feedback).
  4. Implemented review routing on the slash `type/*` taxonomy and left colon
     `type:*` as an orthogonal nature label — the dual-type tension is folded into
     #78 to resolve, not fossilized.
- Nothing parked beyond the next `/goal` — all deferred threads already on the
  tracker (#44, #77–#80).

## Prompt the operator can paste into the next session

```
/goal develop the spec for #78 (canonical issue-type taxonomy definition — promote
the proposals/capture-phase RFC §4 sizing test to canonical handbook practice; the
unblocker of Epic #77). READ #78 comment #1099 first — the feedback-taxonomy
reconciliation (one-axis-for-all vs two-orthogonal-axes) is now in scope. Per #64's
gate this Feature needs a Solution Design → brainstorming session.
```