# Session 0041.0 — Transcript > App: ecomm > Start: 2026-06-22T07-06 (PST) > End: 2026-06-22T07-38 (PST) > Type: capture > Posture: careful > Claude-Session: af2d41d5-d230-4086-a383-1e5f5826db6b > Status: **FINALIZED** > Date: 2026-06-22 (PST) > Goal: Turn the operator's "SDL pipeline refactor — design brief (target state)" > into typed, source-linked Gitea backlog issues. > Outcome: **Done.** 6 issues filed (1 Epic + 5 Features) across two trackers, > fully cross-linked; the brief published to `wiggleverse/engineering` main > (PR #62, merged) and linked as Source on every issue. ## Launch prompt ``` # SDL pipeline refactor — design brief (target state) Restructure the Wiggleverse SDLC into a staged, gated pipeline where every artifact handoff is a review gate. Built with TODAY's five session types — the new session types don't exist yet (bootstrap). [... full brief preserved; see docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md in wiggleverse/engineering, which is the verbatim source of record ...] (Session opened as: CAPTURE — turn this brief into typed, source-linked Gitea issues.) ``` Followed mid-session by the operator's refined filing directive: file the Epic "Restructure the SDLC into a staged, gated pipeline" on the dev-claude-plugin tracker decomposing into 5 named Features; save the brief to `engineering/docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` and link it as the source on each; note that F1 is engineering-repo work and the rest dev-plugin work. ## Plan Capture flow (`wgl-capture`, careful posture): claim tracked-lite transcript → resolve target → assemble/size the asks against handbook §4.3 → draft each issue in reviewable form → operator-approved decomposition → file → type-fit check → clean up drafts → finalize. ## Pre-session state - Launched in an isolated worktree of `wiggleverse-ecomm-content` (`charming-rosalind-9575d0`), clean on `claude/charming-rosalind-9575d0`. - The SDLC refactor was un-captured; no Epic/Features existed; no brief on disk. - Four unrelated unfiled `s42-*` drafts already sat in the dev-plugin content repo's `issues/` (a prior session's leftovers). ## Turn-by-turn arc 1. **Session gate.** Classified the opening brief; two types plausible (brainstorming vs planning-and-executing). Asked the operator → **Capture**. Invoked `wgl-capture`; claimed **ecomm-0041** (capture, careful). 2. **Target resolution.** `ecomm`'s `app.json` declares no tracker, and the work is plugin + handbook tooling, not ecomm product — a target override (PUC-2). First operator answer chose "split: plugin + engineering" trackers. 3. **Decomposition.** Sized the brief against §4.3 → an Epic + candidate Features. Flagged the rolling-wave tension (carve one Feature vs file all). Operator chose **Epic + all Features** (eyes-open, brief is locked). 4. **First draft set (4 Features) written**, presented for VS Code review. 5. **Refined directive.** Operator restated: Epic on dev-plugin, **5** Features (added F5 "wiring"; F3 reframed as a new gate-lifter *session*), save+link the brief, annotate work-repo. Re-asked two forks → **publish brief via branch/PR/I merge**, and tracker = **split** (F1 → engineering tracker; Epic + F2–F5 → dev-plugin), work-repo noted on each. 6. **Brief published.** Branch `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief` on engineering → PR #62 → merged (used the repo-scoped Keychain token via `gitea-api.sh`; the issue-scoped token 403s on `/pulls`). Brief live on engineering `main`. 7. **Issues filed.** Epic #125 (dev-plugin) first; then F1 engineering#63 (cross-tracker parent ref), F2 #126, F3 #127, F4 #128, F5 #129. All `typecheck:ok` (judged 6, mismatch 0). Epic decomposition backfilled with child numbers. 8. **One self-inflicted scare, fixed.** The first Epic-body backfill PATCH hit a heredoc/stdin clash and wiped Epic #125's body (len 1). Caught it on the verify, restored the full body (8272 chars) from the draft via a file-based PATCH, verified. 9. **Cleanup.** Deleted the 6 filed drafts (INV-8). Finalized (this transcript). ## Cut state (end of session) - **Filed:** Epic dev-plugin#125; F1 engineering#63; F2 #126; F3 #127; F4 #128; F5 #129. All carry type + priority + Parent #125 + Work-repo + Source link. - **Brief:** `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` on engineering `main` (PR #62 merged; branch deleted). Engineering local clone back on `main`, clean. - **Session repo** (ecomm-content worktree): clean, no commits, nothing to land. - **Drafts:** 6 SDLC drafts deleted (filed). 4 unfiled `s42-*` drafts remain — resumable next session, untouched (not this session's). - **Memory:** added `sdl-pipeline-refactor-captured.md` + index line + Next /goal. ## What lands on the operator's plate - Nothing blocking. The backlog is filed and visible on both trackers. - The six issues are `priority` provisional (WSJF best-effort) — re-rank at triage if desired. - F1 (engineering#63) is the docs-lead spine and **blocks** F2–F5 — it should be the first to move. ## Prompt the operator can paste into the next session ``` /goal Start F1 of the SDLC pipeline refactor — handbook reconciliation in wiggleverse/engineering (issue #63). Brainstorm/plan the §3.3 accretion rule, the §4.3 slice-retirement (Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; Stories become standalone leaf issues, R2(b)), the solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE updates, and the documented home of the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision. Source of record: engineering docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md. This is the docs-lead spine that F2–F5 (dev-plugin #126–129) cite — land it first. ``` ## Deferred decisions _None — careful posture; every fork was put to the operator (session type, tracker split, decomposition cut, brief-publish method)._