# Session 0041.0 — Transcript > App: ecomm > Start: 2026-06-22T07-06 (PST) > Type: capture > Posture: careful > Claude-Session: af2d41d5-d230-4086-a383-1e5f5826db6b > Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.** > > This file reserves session ID 0041 for ecomm. The driver replaces this > body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final > SESSION-0041.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-06--.md form at session end. ## Launch prompt ``` # SDL pipeline refactor — design brief (target state) Restructure the Wiggleverse SDLC into a staged, gated pipeline where every artifact handoff is a review gate. Built with TODAY's five session types — the new session types don't exist yet (bootstrap). ## The artifact ONE SPEC.md (Solution Design, handbook §3.3), authored by ACCRETION — each design-track stage writes its lens INTO the same growing file, never separate brd.md/prd.md fragments. superpowers:writing-plans expects ONE coherent spec doc; accretion guarantees it. ## Design track (careful, once per Feature) — gate at every seam 1. wgl-brainstorming --lenses brd → SPEC Business lens → GATE 2. wgl-brainstorming --lenses prd → SPEC Product lens + Claude-Design-vs-Code decision → GATE 3. (if decision = Design) Claude Design → wgl-design-handoff → bundle → GATE 4. wgl-tech-design (NEW) → SPEC Engineering lens (pure architecture/contract; NO task breakdown) → GATE → SPEC complete ## Build track (once per Feature) — gate at every seam SPEC.md → wgl-writing-plans (ONE plan, whole Feature) → GATE → wgl-executing-plans (execute that plan) → PPE (§9) No per-slice loop. The plan's native Task→Step structure IS the decomposition. ## Decisions (locked — do not re-litigate) - Every seam is a gate for now; wrapping multiple gates into one session is a later optimization. - One SPEC = one plan = one execution. "Slice" is NOT used — superpowers has no such concept (its grain is sub-project / spec / plan / Task / Step). The SPEC Delivery Plan carries rollout/launch strategy only, NOT a task list. - Two altitudes stay distinct: wgl-tech-design = architecture/contract (no tasks); wgl-writing-plans = the full task breakdown. - Terminology: "Solution Design" = the WHOLE SPEC. The new step is wgl-tech-design (authors one lens), NOT wgl-solution-design. - §4.3 reconciliation: a Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; its internal units are the plan's Tasks. The Feature→Story(slice) sub-layer collapses — Stories become STANDALONE leaf issues only (R2(b)), not a Feature sub-layer. R1–R4 otherwise intact. - "Which lenses exist" is governed by issue type (§4.3): Feature → brd+prd required (R3); leaf story/task/bug → lenses skippable, tech-design authors a thin SPEC; nothing warranted → skip design track, build straight from the issue (R2(b)). ## Superpowers mapping (native grain, no overlay) - superpowers:brainstorming is a borrowed DIALOGUE technique only; wgl owns the terminal state (a lens run never hands off to writing-plans). - superpowers:writing-plans wants ONE spec doc and assumes scope decomposition happened upstream; wgl-tech-design completing one SPEC satisfies that. - superpowers:writing-plans and :executing-plans are already SEPARATE skills; the plan doc is their handoff. wgl-writing-plans / wgl-executing-plans are thin wrappers at native grain: one SPEC → one plan → one execution. ## Wiggleverse rules every session honors - Docs lead automation (§4.1): handbook changes FIRST; skills CITE it, never restate canonical taxonomy/pipeline (§4.1/§4.2). - Deterministic-first (§4.2); branch → PR → merge (§5.4); plugin version bump per change; git over SSH (§5.2). (Session opened as: CAPTURE — turn this brief into typed, source-linked Gitea issues.) ``` ## Deferred decisions _Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at finalize. Empty if none._