add dev-claude-plugin/0024/SESSION-0024.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-07T08-47--2026-06-07T09-33.md + replace placeholder/variant SESSION-0024.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-07T08-47--INPROGRESS.md

2026-06-07 09:34:04 -07:00
parent f63a4b7a60
commit e8d9739e51
2 changed files with 78 additions and 23 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# Session 0024.0 — Transcript
+
+> App: dev-claude-plugin
+> Start: 2026-06-07T08-47 (PST)
+> End: 2026-06-07T09-33 (PST)
+> Type: brainstorming (design-only; feedback-as-Gitea-issues SP1)
+> Status: **FINALIZED.**
+
+## Launch prompt
+
+```
+When starting a session in the plugin dir, we should check if there's any feedback and let the user know so they can address it. We should also have a skill for processing and addressing feedback and integrating what we choose into the plugin (this should be a standard brainstorming session, which will lead to a writing-plans session, which will lead to an executing-plans session. It's ok if all feedback is considered in the brainstorming session). I think a "/goal feedback" would work well.
+```
+
+## Pre-state
+
+- Plugin source at **v0.18.0** on `main` (`4fe6998`), clean tree.
+- Feedback corpus: 4 `new` notes in the in-repo `feedback/` file corpus; two
+  skills (`wgl-dev-plugin-feedback` capture, `wgl-dev-plugin-review-feedback`
+  review) + 3 file-based scripts; lifecycle in `feedback/README.md`.
+- Three hooks (SessionStart gate, Stop finalize-on-goal, SessionEnd
+  finalize-guard). Gate already special-cases `/goal next`.
+- Effort B (session-type rename to `wgl-brainstorming`/`wgl-writing-plans`/
+  `wgl-executing-plans`) had just landed in 0.18.0 (session 0023) — surfaced
+  mid-session via a memory update.
+
+## Arc
+
+1. **Gate + classification.** Opened as a coding session via `wgl-session-coding-init`
+   (0.17.0 cache); claimed session **0024** (peek showed 0020–0023 in-flight but
+   unfinalized — warned + proceeded under autonomous default; did not adopt since
+   none flagged ENDED-UNFINALIZED). Clean `main` baseline confirmed.
+2. **Brainstorming** (`superpowers:brainstorming`). Explored the existing feedback
+   machinery. Key decisions via AskUserQuestion:
+   - Evolve `wgl-dev-plugin-review-feedback` into the pipeline (vs a 2nd skill).
+   - Notice via a new fail-open SessionStart hook (vs folding into init).
+   - SP1 now / SP2 later; effort B dependency observed as landed (0.18.0) → SP2
+     unblocked.
+   - **Operator pivot:** feedback should be **Gitea issues**, not files (native
+     state + direct human filing). Migrate the 4 notes to issues.
+   - Feasibility verified LIVE: repo `has_issues:true`, token `permissions:{admin}`.
+3. **Decomposition.** SP1 (issues storage + capture rewrite + scripts as
+   `gitea-api.sh` wrappers + migrate notes + `hooks/feedback-notice`) NOW; SP2
+   (`/goal feedback` gate routing + review-skill-as-orchestrator) deferred.
+4. **Spec written + approved** →
+   `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-07-feedback-as-gitea-issues-design.md`,
+   committed on branch `feat/feedback-as-gitea-issues` (`6d97845`), pushed.
+5. **writing-plans STARTED** (`superpowers:writing-plans`): read `gitea-api.sh`,
+   drafted the full script designs — but operator stopped to do implementation in
+   a fresh session before the plan doc was written.
+
+## Cut state
+
+- Branch `feat/feedback-as-gitea-issues` on origin, 1 commit (the approved design
+  doc). No PR, not merged — implementation pending.
+- No code/script/skill changes; no version bump (still 0.18.0).
+- Memory updated (`Next /goal:` = implement SP1; session-0024 entry; follow-ups).
+
+## Deferred decisions
+
+- **Area as a body line, not labels.** When presented "approve / area-as-labels-too
+  / adjust," the operator chose "approve, write the spec" — keeping the body-line
+  default for the unbounded `area` dimension. Revisit if filtering by area becomes
+  useful.
+
+## Gotchas
+
+- `session-end-finalize-guard` stamped an `ENDED-UNFINALIZED` banner on THIS
+  still-live 0024 placeholder (09-17), likely a harness resume firing SessionEnd
+  mid-session. Cleared by hand. A genuine candidate feedback item (the guard can
+  banner a live session) — to be filed as the first issue once `file-feedback.sh`
+  exists.
+
+## Next session
+
+```
+/goal implement SP1 — feedback as Gitea issues — from docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-07-feedback-as-gitea-issues-design.md on branch feat/feedback-as-gitea-issues (writing-plans → executing-plans): label model + ensure-feedback-labels.sh; file-feedback.sh / list-feedback.sh / set-feedback-status.sh as gitea-api.sh wrappers; rewrite capture + review skills; migrate the 4 notes to issues + repurpose feedback/README.md; new hooks/feedback-notice SessionStart hook; bump 0.18.0 -> 0.19.0 + CLAUDE.md hooks 3 -> 4
+```
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-# Session 0024.0 — Transcript
-
-> App: dev-claude-plugin
-> Start: 2026-06-07T08-47 (PST)
-> Type: coding
-> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.**
->
-> This file reserves session ID 0024 for dev-claude-plugin. The driver replaces this
-> body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final
-> SESSION-0024.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-07T08-47--<end>.md form at session end.
-
-## Launch prompt
-
-```
-When starting a session in the plugin dir, we should check if there's any feedback and let the user know so they can address it. We should also have a skill for processing and addressing feedback and integrating what we choose into the plugin (this should be a standard brainstorming session, which will lead to a writing-plans session, which will lead to an executing-plans session. It's ok if all feedback is considered in the brainstorming session). I think a "/goal feedback" would work well.
-
-```
-
-## Deferred decisions
-
-_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
-liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
-finalize. Empty if none._