add 0060/SESSION-0060.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-01T06-30--2026-06-01T09-00.md + replace placeholder/variant SESSION-0060.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-01T06-30--INPROGRESS.md

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-01 09:00:26 -07:00
parent 02bccccb5a
commit 4b324e4261
2 changed files with 264 additions and 48 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
# Session 0060.0 — Transcript
> Date: 2026-06-01
> Start: 2026-06-01T06-30 (PST implied)
> Goal: launch-app **Slice 2** — correct the SPEC against the extracted
> engine, build the `deployment.toml` schema + fail-closed `validate` verb
> (SPEC §5.3), and author the `define-deployment` skill (§6.6). Pre-prod,
> single environment.
>
> Outcome: **All Slice 2 deliverables shipped and MERGED.**
> `wiggleverse/engineering` PR #3 (SPEC v0.0.2 + `define-deployment` skill +
> ROADMAP close) → merged `914bf74`. `flotilla-core` extended to **v0.3.0**
> (`scaffold` / fail-closed `validate` / reconciling `import` +
> `gcloud.describe_config`) → PR #1 merged `4841361`, **371 tests green**.
> Dogfood produced + validated `wiggle-snip/deployment.toml`. The session
> also **created the `wiggleverse/flotilla-core` Gitea repo** (operator) and
> **integrated a live collision** with a parallel preview-environments line.
>
> Highlights:
> - Spec-leads-code done literally: the SPEC correction landed as its **own
> commit** before any verb was built (`43bfa93`, guide §3.2).
> - Discovered a **parallel session actively building preview-environments**
> in flotilla-core's main checkout → isolated all work in a git **worktree**
> (guide §5.4 / memory). That call paid off: the two lines collided on a
> shared `v0.2.0`; the worktree let the rebase-to-`v0.3.0` be clean.
> - The §8.3 secrets rule held mechanically end to end — the Gitea bot token
> was used (to drive PRs via the API) **without a single secret byte
> entering the session**: fetched into a shell var, never echoed.
---
## Launch prompt
```
# launch-app Slice 2 — deployment.toml schema + define-deployment (SPEC §5, §6.6)
Slice 1 is done and verified: flotilla-core v0.1.0 is extracted at
~/projects/wiggleverse/flotilla-core (315 tests green), ohm-rfc-app-flotilla is a
thin shim over it (v1.8.0, branch slice1-extract-flotilla-core pushed, PR open,
NOT yet merged), and OHM re-deploys through the core unchanged (live DB + pin
0.31.3 + 8 secret refs + live /api/health 200 all proven).
## Task
1. FIRST correct the SPEC per SLICE-1-SPEC-FEEDBACK.md (its own commit, guide §3.2).
2. Firm up the §5.1 schema and build the fail-closed `validate` verb (§5.3).
3. Build `define-deployment`: the topology+names interview deriving from the One
Name (§3.3), emitting + validating the record per the §8 UX contract. NEVER ask
for secret bytes (§8.3).
## Tests
- Each §5.3 rule rejects a crafted-bad record with the right message.
- A good record validates and round-trips through flotilla-core's loader.
- Dogfood: define-deployment produces a valid deployment.toml for wiggle-snip.
## Scope guard
Pre-prod, single environment. NO slots/ramp/promote/rollback/compat-gate.
## Process
Spec-driven, cite section numbers in commits; branch + PR (Gitea, no gh CLI).
Hard secrets rule (SPEC §8.3): stdin-piped gestures only. Test run of our own
tooling — do NOT publish a transcript unless I say so.
```
> Note on the transcript: the launch prompt said "do NOT publish a transcript
> unless I say so." Mid-session the operator said to publish — hence this file.
---
## Pre-session state
- **launch-app suite** (`~/projects/wiggleverse/engineering/launch-app/`):
SPEC v0.0.1 + ROADMAP + `SLICE-1-SPEC-FEEDBACK.md` existed locally but were
**never committed** (the `engineering` repo tracked only the top-level
handbook `README.md`).
- **flotilla-core** (`~/projects/wiggleverse/flotilla-core`): v0.1.0 at commit
`cf22fc8` (315 tests). **No git remote.** Its main working tree carried
**uncommitted preview-environments WIP** (`health.py`, `registry.py`,
`009_previews.sql`) — a parallel effort.
- **wiggle-snip** (`~/projects/wiggleverse/wiggle-snip`): the §5.1 happy-path
fixture; built + tested; **not a git repo**; no `deployment.toml`; no GCP
foundation yet. Needs only `DATABASE_PATH`; no secrets (URL shortener).
- **`scaffold-gcp-project`** skill exists; no other launch-app skill existed.
---
## Turn-by-turn arc
### Arc 1 — Read the contract before touching code
Read SPEC, ROADMAP, `SLICE-1-SPEC-FEEDBACK.md`, the engineering guide, and the
extracted engine (`deployment_toml.py`, `registry.py`, `cli.py`, `context.py`,
`gcloud.py`, `secrets.py`, `plan.py`, conftest) plus the wiggle-snip fixture and
the `scaffold-gcp-project` skill (to mirror skill conventions). Settled the
build shape: the schema + `validate` + `scaffold` are **testable flotilla-core
code**; `define-deployment` is a **skill** that drives those verbs.
### Arc 2 — Correct the SPEC FIRST (its own commit, guide §3.2)
Baseline-committed the un-tracked Slice-1 artifacts (`330d879`) so the
correction would land as a clean diff, then made the **SPEC v0.0.2**
correction (`43bfa93`) settling all of `SLICE-1-SPEC-FEEDBACK`:
- **§5.2** — config (`deployment.toml`) vs the engine's separate local **state
store** (deploy history / health snapshots / the §8.3 deploy lock). The toml
is config-only; that state is never in it and never reconstructable from it.
- **§3.2.1** — the canonicity fork settled: **toml-canonical** for new apps,
the registry a reconcilable cache; OHM stays grandfathered registry-canonical.
- **§5.1** — added `[app].gitea_host` + optional `[app].gitea_read_secret_ref`
(a private-repo read credential — a reference, never bytes); §5.2.1 states the
single-repo assumption (OHM's pin/source/content split is grandfathered).
- **§5.3** — the `vm.project == gcloud_config-project` check needs a NEW
read-only `gcloud config configurations describe`; **PASS/WARN/FAIL**
outcomes; §5.3.1 scopes `validate` to define-deployment-authored records.
- **§7.1** — "operator-CLI engine", not "9-phase deploy engine".
Verified the `gcloud config configurations describe <name> --format=json` shape
is read-only **before** depending on it: it returns `properties.core.project`
and the on-disk active-config pointer (`benstull-infra`) stayed put.
### Arc 3 — A parallel session is live → isolate in a worktree
On branching flotilla-core, found **uncommitted preview-environments WIP** in
the main tree — and on re-checking minutes later it had **grown** (now
`cloudrun.py`, `preview.py`, `CHANGELOG.md`, a `VERSION`/`pyproject` bump):
a **parallel session was actively building** there. Deleted the entangled
branch and moved all Slice 2 work into an **isolated git worktree**
(`~/projects/wiggleverse/flotilla-core-slice2`, branched from `cf22fc8`, own
venv) per guide §5.4 / the worktree-for-parallel-git memory. Only read-only git
was ever run in the shared main checkout thereafter.
### Arc 4 — Build flotilla-core v0.2.0 (the mechanical core)
- `gcloud.describe_config()` / `config_project()` — the read-only project read,
injectable (a `GcloudRunner`) so tests exercise it with no real gcloud;
unreadable → a `GcloudReadError` the validator renders as **WARN**.
- `deployment_toml.scaffold()` — derive a full §5.1 record from the One Name
(§3.3). Mechanical §8.3 guard: refuses any `--secret-ref` /
`gitea_read_secret_ref` that doesn't match the `<project>/<id>[@version]`
reference shape, so the emitter can never write secret bytes.
- `deployment_toml.validate()` — the §5.3 fail-closed checks, each PASS/WARN/FAIL
+ remediation; only a FAIL blocks. (`_is_under` uses path-segment containment
so `/opt/x-evil` is correctly **not** under `/opt/x`.)
- `sync_to_registry(reconcile=…)` — toml-canonical (§3.2.1): re-import updates
the row in place and prunes overlay/secret keys the toml dropped.
- CLI verbs `deployment scaffold | validate | import`.
**Dead end (kept, honest):** the first commit attempt used `git commit -m '…'`
with a message containing "the §5.1 schema's own verbs" — the apostrophe in
"schema's" closed the single quote and zsh tried to run the backticks/`>` in the
rest as shell. Switched to `git commit -F <file>` for every multi-line message
after. Committed as `a9a4983` (v0.2.0).
### Arc 5 — Tests + dogfood
28 new tests: each §5.3 rule rejects a crafted-bad record with its message; a
good scaffolded record validates + round-trips through the loader; reconcile
prunes; CLI exit codes. **Full suite 343 passed.** Then ran the real
`define-deployment` gesture against wiggle-snip → `deployment.toml` validates
(5 PASS, 1 expected WARN: its gcloud config doesn't exist until Slice 3/5) →
`import``deployment show` → 9-phase plan assembly. Surfaced one friction note
(scaffold always emits `APP_URL`, which wiggle-snip doesn't consume → Slice-5
backlog).
### Arc 6 — The `define-deployment` skill (§6.6)
Authored `launch-app/skills/define-deployment/SKILL.md`: probe → confirm the One
Name → ask the non-derivable choices → scaffold → validate → explain → import.
Hard §8.3 rule throughout — records secret **references** only, hands the
operator the stdin-piped `secret set` gesture, never asks for a value. Committed
`c47386e` with the ROADMAP Slice 2 close + next-session brief.
### Arc 7 — Ship it (PRs over the Gitea API, secrets-safe)
Pushed the `engineering` branch (SSH). The operator had asked for "branch + PR".
Rather than hand back a URL, drove the PR via the Gitea API — fetching the
`ohm-rfc-app-gitea-bot-token` into a shell variable that was **never echoed**
(no secret byte in the session, §8.3). Confirmed the bot has admin/push on
`wiggleverse/engineering`, opened **PR #3**, and (operator-approved) **merged**
it → `914bf74`; synced local `main`.
### Arc 8 — flotilla-core repo creation: a real wall
The flotilla-core repo had no remote. Tried to create `wiggleverse/flotilla-core`
via the API with the bot token → **403** (the bot lacks org repo-create). Tried
SSH push-to-create → **"Push to create is not enabled for organizations."** So
repo creation was genuinely operator-only. Pre-set the `origin` remote so the
push would just work once it existed, and handed the operator the one manual
step. Recorded the concurrent-lines hazard + likely **v0.2.0 collision** in
memory.
### Arc 9 — Operator created the repo; push + the collision
Operator created `wiggleverse/flotilla-core` (private). Their manual push failed
only because pasted `# cf22fc8` comments were read as refspecs; pushed `main` +
`slice2-schema-validate` from the session instead. Opened **PR #1** — but it came
back **`mergeable: False`**. Root cause: the **parallel preview-environments line
had pushed straight to `main`** as `333e0ff` (also tagged "v0.2.0") in the gap.
The two lines had diverged from `cf22fc8` — the predicted collision, live.
### Arc 10 — Integrate: rebase to v0.3.0, prove coexistence
Measured the conflict surface: only `VERSION`, `pyproject.toml`, `cli.py`
(`registry.py`/`health.py` were preview-only — no overlap). Rebased the Slice 2
branch onto the new `main` in the worktree; `cli.py` **auto-merged cleanly**
(both the `preview` command group and the `deployment scaffold|validate|import`
verbs present); resolved `VERSION`/`pyproject` to **v0.3.0** (deconflicting the
duplicate 0.2.0). Reinstalled + ran the **combined** suite (preview tests + mine):
**371 passed.** Amended the commit to v0.3.0 (`9b15b2a`), force-pushed (updated
PR #1), confirmed **`mergeable: True`**, and — operator-asked — **merged** PR #1
`4841361`. Deliberately did **not** `git pull` the shared main checkout (the
parallel session has uncommitted work there; its next pull picks up the merge).
### Arc 11 — Publish (this transcript)
Operator asked to publish a transcript. Claimed **0060** via
`claim-session-id.sh`, finalized this file, gave the next-session handoff in
chat, and published.
---
## Cross-references
- **`wiggleverse/engineering`** — PR #3 MERGED `914bf74`. Commits: `330d879`
(baseline Slice-1 artifacts), `43bfa93` (SPEC v0.0.2 correction), `c47386e`
(define-deployment skill + ROADMAP close). SPEC now **v0.0.2**.
- **`wiggleverse/flotilla-core`** — repo created (private), PR #1 MERGED
`4841361`. Now **v0.3.0** (`9b15b2a` rebased atop the preview line `333e0ff`).
Worktree at `~/projects/wiggleverse/flotilla-core-slice2` (branch deleted on
remote post-merge; safe to remove). **371 tests green.**
- **wiggle-snip** — `deployment.toml` generated + validated (not a git repo).
- **Parallel line** — preview-environments (`feat/preview-environments` + the
WIP that became `333e0ff` on main) is a separate, still-active effort; no OHM
deploy, no `ohm-rfc` / §13 edit happened this session.
---
## Next-session prompt
> **State (after Slice 2, 2026-06-01):** launch-app SPEC is **v0.0.2**;
> `define-deployment` (§6.6) + `scaffold-gcp-project` (§6.5) skills exist;
> `flotilla-core` is **v0.3.0** on `wiggleverse/flotilla-core` `main`
> (private repo now created) with `deployment scaffold|validate|import` +
> `gcloud.describe_config`, sitting atop the merged preview-environments line.
> wiggle-snip has a validated `deployment.toml`.
>
> **Next: Slice 3 — `provision-vm` + `scaffold-gitea-repos`** (SPEC §2, §6.7,
> §6.8). `provision-vm` gates on `deployment validate` (§4.2) — built + proven.
> wiggle-snip needs its GCP foundation first (`scaffold-gcp-project`), which
> clears the one dogfood WARN.
>
> **Open follow-ups (not Slice 2):** (a) the launch-app suite skills should be
> installed/symlinked for invocation; (b) pin `ohm-rfc-app-flotilla`'s
> dependency to the now-published `flotilla-core` + add it to the Patchwatch
> runner build context; (c) merge `slice1-extract-flotilla-core` (OHM-shim,
> driver-session territory); (d) Slice-5 backlog: `scaffold` emits an unused
> `APP_URL` overlay key by default.
>
> **Coordination:** a parallel preview-environments line shares `flotilla-core`.
> Work each line in its own **worktree**; never run mutating git in the shared
> main checkout while it's active. Both lines touch `cli.py` (additive command
> groups) — expect trivial conflicts only.
>
> **Scope guard:** pre-prod only, single environment. Slots / ramp / canary /
> rollback are guide §10, out of scope (SPEC §10).
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
# Session 0060.0 — Transcript
> Date: 2026-06-01
> Start: 2026-06-01T06-30 (PST implied)
> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.**
>
> This file reserves session ID 0060. The driver replaces this body
> with the full transcript before publishing, and renames the file to
> its final SESSION-0060.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-01T06-30--<end>.md form.
---
## Launch prompt
```
# launch-app Slice 2 — deployment.toml schema + define-deployment (SPEC §5, §6.6)
Slice 1 is done and verified: flotilla-core v0.1.0 is extracted at
~/projects/wiggleverse/flotilla-core (315 tests green), ohm-rfc-app-flotilla is a
thin shim over it (v1.8.0, branch slice1-extract-flotilla-core pushed, PR open,
NOT yet merged), and OHM re-deploys through the core unchanged (live DB + pin
0.31.3 + 8 secret refs + live /api/health 200 all proven).
## Task
1. FIRST correct the SPEC per SLICE-1-SPEC-FEEDBACK.md (its own commit, guide §3.2).
Load-bearing decisions: §5.2 separate local STATE store; §3.2/§5.1 toml-vs-registry
canonicity; add a Gitea host + optional [app].gitea_read_secret_ref + single-repo
note; §5.3 needs a read-only `gcloud config configurations describe` capability,
and validate only applies to define-deployment-authored records.
2. Firm up the §5.1 schema and build the fail-closed `validate` verb (§5.3).
3. Build `define-deployment`: the topology+names interview deriving from the One
Name (§3.3), emitting + validating the record per the §8 UX contract. NEVER ask
for secret bytes (§8.3).
## Tests
- Each §5.3 rule rejects a crafted-bad record with the right message.
- A good record validates and round-trips through flotilla-core's loader.
- Dogfood: define-deployment produces a valid deployment.toml for wiggle-snip.
## Scope guard
Pre-prod, single environment. NO slots/ramp/promote/rollback/compat-gate.
## Process
Spec-driven, cite section numbers in commits; branch + PR (Gitea, no gh CLI).
Hard secrets rule (SPEC §8.3): stdin-piped gestures only. Test run of our own
tooling — do NOT publish a transcript unless I say so.
```