From 342313d856ef7f7bd5063d466b6462910025f740 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Stull Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 07:48:52 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] add dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md + replace placeholder/variant SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-07T09-29--2026-06-07T14-25.md --- ...RIPT-2026-06-07T09-29--2026-06-07T14-25.md | 127 ------------------ ...TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md | 80 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-07T09-29--2026-06-07T14-25.md create mode 100644 dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md diff --git a/dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-07T09-29--2026-06-07T14-25.md b/dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-07T09-29--2026-06-07T14-25.md deleted file mode 100644 index c51c659..0000000 --- a/dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-07T09-29--2026-06-07T14-25.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,127 +0,0 @@ -# Session 0025.0 — Transcript - -> App: dev-claude-plugin -> Start: 2026-06-07T09-29 (PST) -> End: 2026-06-07T14-25 (PST) -> Type: coding -> Goal: decide where the superpowers spec & plan artifacts live (operator: put -> them on the app's `*-content` repo under `specs/` and `plans/` so rfc-app can -> render them as reviewable collections). -> Outcome: **design-only** — brainstormed + approved + committed a design doc; -> branch pushed, NOT merged. Implementation is the explicit follow-up. - -## Launch prompt - -``` -Update the superpowers spec and plan artifact file locations to live on the -app's *-content repo, under "specs" and "plans" directories — so that if we set -up collections in the rfc-app they'll be easy to review. -``` - -## Plan - -What the session set out to do, and what it became: the ask started as "move the -spec/plan file locations to the content repo," but brainstorming surfaced that -the question is entangled with the session-type taxonomy (the v0.18.0 verbiage -rename had renamed spec-init → `wgl-writing-plans`, colliding with superpowers' -"writing-plans = implementation plan" meaning, and had left plans with no durable -home). So the session became the **artifact-pipeline reconciliation** that memory -had flagged as deferred — designed, not yet built. - -## Pre-session state - -- On `feat/feedback-as-gitea-issues` with one unpushed design-doc commit - (`6d97845`) for a *different* feature (parked, left untouched). -- `main` = `origin/main` = `4fe6998` (v0.18.0) at session start. -- Memory's recorded `Next /goal` for this thread was the artifact-pipeline - reconciliation. - -## Turn-by-turn arc - -1. **Gate + claim.** Classified the prompt as a coding session; ran - `wgl-session-coding-init` (under the live 0.17.0 cache). Peek showed four open - `--INPROGRESS` placeholders (0020/0021/0022/0024) — none flagged - ENDED-UNFINALIZED; treated as stale/abandoned, warned and proceeded - (autonomous). Claimed **0025**. -2. **Baseline.** Found I was on the parked feedback branch, not clean `main`. - Established `main` was the real baseline; branched fresh - `feat/two-session-artifact-collections` off `main`; left the feedback branch - alone. -3. **Explored current artifact routing** (Explore agent): specs → `spec-rfc` role - via `submit-spec.sh`; **plans have no durable home** (transcript + memory - only); BDDs → `bdd` role; the schema enum already has `content`, `specs`, - `spec-rfc` roles but the runtime only resolves `spec-rfc`. -4. **Brainstormed** (superpowers:brainstorming). Key discoveries, in dialogue with - the operator: - - Vanilla superpowers does plan→execute in **one session**; the **spec** is the - human-reviewed artifact, the **plan** is agent-facing (no review gate). - - Our v0.18.0 split `writing-plans`/`executing-plans` into separate tracked - sessions, which is why a plan would need a durable home — but it has none. - - Operator's reframe: **collapse to two session types** — `session-brainstorming` - and `session-planning-and-executing`. - - Plans: keep as a **non-reviewed archive record** (→ `content/plans/`). - - BDDs: **inputs** to brainstorming, not outputs — leave them alone. -5. **Confirmed the v0.18.0 collision** by reading the renamed skills: `wgl-writing-plans` - actually authors the *spec*, not an impl plan. Read the verbiage-rename design - doc — it had explicitly *conflated* the Solution-Design spec with "the - superpowers writing-plans artifact." Our design supersedes that. -6. **Presented the full design; operator approved** ("yes" to the two-session model, - retiring `wgl-writing-plans`, and the `content` role over `spec-rfc`). -7. **Wrote + self-reviewed + committed** the design doc (`dc684a8`); tightened the - BDD-as-input wording. Pushed the branch (`origin` set). -8. **Operator invoked `/wgl-session-finalize`** at the design checkpoint. -9. **Finalize.** Discovered (via memory + fetch) that origin/main had advanced to - **0.20.0** concurrently (sessions 0026/0022). Corrected the doc's version target - to "next free minor (≥0.21.0), rebase first" (`16e9dd7`); re-pushed. Updated - memory surgically without clobbering the concurrent SP2 `Next /goal`. Stripped a - spurious ENDED-UNFINALIZED banner the SessionEnd guard had stamped mid-session. - -## Cut state (end of session) - -- Branch `feat/two-session-artifact-collections` pushed to origin, **2 commits** - (`dc684a8` design doc, `16e9dd7` version-target correction), based on the - pre-advance `main` (4fe6998); **15 commits behind current origin/main (0.20.0)**. -- No PR, no merge, no version bump. Working tree clean. -- The parked `feat/feedback-as-gitea-issues` branch untouched. -- Design doc: - `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-07-two-session-model-and-artifact-collections-design.md`. - -## Deferred decisions - -Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls surfaced at finalize: - -1. **Disposition = push-only, no PR/merge.** This session produced the design doc - only; implementation is the explicit follow-up. Chose to push the branch (no - stranding) and ship design + impl together in one PR later (the v0.18.0 - verbiage-rename precedent), rather than open/merge a design-only PR. Alternative: - merge the design doc to `main` on its own now. -2. **Did NOT clobber the top-level SP2 `Next /goal`** that a concurrent session set - in shared memory. Recorded this thread's continuation in the effort-B - follow-up bullet and surface it below instead. Alternative: overwrite the field - with this thread's next step. -3. **`content` role over repurposing `spec-rfc`**, and **removing `wgl-writing-plans` - outright** (vs a stub) — both explicitly approved by the operator during - brainstorming, so low residual risk. -4. **Version target left open** ("next free minor, ≥0.21.0") rather than a fixed - number, since origin/main moved during the session. - -## What lands on the operator's plate - -- Nothing blocking. The design is approved and recorded; nothing shipped. -- A real concurrency observation worth a feedback issue: the - `session-end-finalize-guard` banner-stamped THIS live placeholder mid-session - (same gotcha logged in 0024) — a live-session false positive. -- When ready to implement: the branch must be **rebased onto current origin/main - (0.20.0)** first. - -## Prompt the operator can paste into the next session - -This session's thread (the artifact-pipeline reconciliation) continues with: - -``` -/goal Implement the two-session-model + spec/plan content-repo collections design (docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-07-two-session-model-and-artifact-collections-design.md): rebase feat/two-session-artifact-collections onto origin/main, then writing-plans → execute → ship (≥0.21.0) -``` - -Note: shared memory's top-level `Next /goal` is currently **SP2** (the `/goal -feedback` orchestrator), set by a concurrent session — pick whichever thread you -want next. diff --git a/dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md b/dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4874eb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev-claude-plugin/0025/SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--INPROGRESS.md @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +# Session 0025.0 — Transcript + +> App: engineering +> Start: 2026-06-22T07-40 (PST) +> Type: planning-and-executing +> Posture: yolo +> Claude-Session: 3141c3a0-ef70-4f90-9c36-f82858f08d3a +> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.** +> +> This file reserves session ID 0025 for engineering. The driver replaces this +> body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final +> SESSION-0025.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-22T07-40--.md form at session end. + +## Launch prompt + +``` +Start F1 of the SDLC pipeline refactor — handbook reconciliation in +wiggleverse/engineering (issue #63 on the dev-claude-plugin tracker): §3.3 +accretion, §4.3 slice-retirement (Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; +Stories become standalone leaf issues, R2(b)), solution-design GUIDE/TEMPLATE +updates, and the documented home of the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision. +Source: engineering docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md (decisions locked). +It's the docs-lead spine F2–F5 cite — first. + +``` + +## Plan + +> Anchor: design `docs/sdl-pipeline-refactor-brief.md` (R2a — locked Solution-Design +> brief; eligibility ELIGIBLE). Work repo: `wiggleverse/engineering`. Feature #63 on +> the dev-claude-plugin tracker. Branch: `feat/sdlc-f1-handbook-reconciliation`. + +**F1 — Handbook reconciliation for the staged-gate SDLC pipeline.** Reconcile the +canonical engineering docs to the brief's locked decisions. F1 is the *only* Feature +touching `engineering` (F2–F5 are dev-claude-plugin), so the full handbook sweep +happens here or never — internal consistency is required, not optional. + +Deliverables (per brief §F1): +1. **§3.3 accretion** (README) — the Solution Design is authored by ACCRETION: each + design-track lens (business → product → engineering) is written into the same + growing SPEC at its own gated stage; never separate brd.md/prd.md files; one + coherent doc `superpowers:writing-plans` consumes. Reframe the Delivery row + + traceability row (drop "Slice"). +2. **§4.3 reconciliation** (README) — Feature = one SPEC = one plan = one execution; + its internal units are the plan's Tasks (not slices/Stories). Feature→Story(slice) + sub-layer retired; Stories are STANDALONE leaf issues only (R2(b)). "Slice" is not + used (superpowers grain: sub-project / spec / plan / Task / Step). R1–R4 intact. +3. **GUIDE/TEMPLATE** — accretion authoring model (replaces "drafted whole, reviewed + whole"); §7 Delivery Plan = rollout/launch strategy only (retire §7.2 "Slicing + plan" task-checklist; renumber 7.3→7.2, 7.4→7.3); relocate the `**Design:**` field + to §5.1 (Product lens, with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision); drop "Slice" + columns from traceability + docs tables. +4. **Claude-Design-vs-Code home** — keep §5.1 (Product/prd lens) as the documented + home; note the decision is authored at the prd-lens stage under accretion. +5. **Full slice sweep** across README §4 day-to-day, §7 roadmap, §10, lifecycle tree. + +Then: verify (residual-slice grep + internal §7.x ref check) → commit → PR → merge. +No engineering version bump (handbook, not a semver'd plugin). No code/tests/PPE +(docs-only; the pipeline's E2E/PPE gates don't apply to a prose change). + +## Deferred decisions + +_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have +liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at +finalize. Empty if none._ + +- **Full-handbook slice sweep (scope).** The brief's F1 item enumerates §3.3/§4.3/ + GUIDE/TEMPLATE/claude-design-home, but "slice" is load-bearing in README §7 + (roadmap) and §4 too. Since F1 is the only engineering-touching Feature, I swept + all of them for internal consistency rather than leaving §7 contradicting a + slice-retired §4.3. Confidence high (forced by the decomposition), logged for + visibility. +- **`**Design:**` field relocation + plugin lag.** Retiring per-slice §7.2 leaves the + shipped `**Design:**` field (consumed by `wgl-design-handoff` + the design-readiness + soft gate, which read it per-`--slice`) without a slice home. I relocated it to the + SPEC's §5.1 (Product lens), co-located with the Claude-Design-vs-Code decision — + one SPEC = one design decision. The plugin's `--slice`-grained plumbing + (`backfill-spec-design.sh`, `design-readiness.sh`) now lags the docs and needs a + downstream reconciliation (candidate: F5 wiring / a follow-up issue). Flagged, not + fixed in F1 (docs-lead-automation, §4.1).