add ohm/0079/SESSION-0079.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-06T00-49--2026-06-06T11-44.md + replace placeholder/variant SESSION-0079.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-06T00-49--INPROGRESS.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
|
||||
# Session 0079.0 — Transcript
|
||||
|
||||
> App: ohm
|
||||
> Start: 2026-06-06T00-49 (PST)
|
||||
> End: 2026-06-06T11-44 (PST)
|
||||
> Type: discovery
|
||||
> Status: **FINALIZED**
|
||||
> Driver model: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M)
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch prompt
|
||||
|
||||
> "Do you think we can use tags to do what I was planning with BDD releases?
|
||||
> Ideally we can tag both what the feature of a BDD scenario is, but also allow
|
||||
> people to manage release tags. The tag functionality would have to get much
|
||||
> more integrated into the UX (tag management, tag types/templates [e.g. add a
|
||||
> 'release' type of tag to the BDD project and when a new 'release' tag is created,
|
||||
> it follows conventions set in the definition of the release tag], filtering in
|
||||
> the left pane, workflow for tagging/untagging content)" — opened via
|
||||
> `/superpowers:brainstorming`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Outcome (one line)
|
||||
|
||||
A **discovery** session that produced and landed a Solution Design —
|
||||
`docs/design/2026-06-06-configurable-collection-metadata.md` (rfc-app **PR #26**,
|
||||
v0.1.6) — and, in the course of writing it, substantially **revised the canonical
|
||||
Solution Design standard** (engineering GUIDE/TEMPLATE + handbook §7,
|
||||
**PR #14**).
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-state
|
||||
|
||||
- Opened on rfc-app `main`; baseline clean at claim. A live **concurrent session**
|
||||
(0078/0083 lineage) shared the canonical checkout — the §5.4 worktree hazard was
|
||||
in force the whole session.
|
||||
- The "BDD releases" plan existed only in the operator's head; no design in-repo.
|
||||
The retired **BDD Release Planner** (`wiggleverse-ecomm-bdd-release-planner-app`)
|
||||
was the reference: it clustered scenarios into named releases, attaching
|
||||
priority/owner/status, emitting a `RELEASE-PLAN.md` roadmap. §22 absorbed its
|
||||
*corpus hosting* but not its *annotation* half.
|
||||
|
||||
## The arc
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Session gate** → classified as discovery; `wgl-session-discovery-init` claimed
|
||||
0079 (warned about in-flight 0078, proceeded autonomously).
|
||||
2. **Brainstorming** (visual companion accepted; mockups under `.superpowers/`).
|
||||
Explored: tags today are free-form `tags_json` with no filtering; BDD = a
|
||||
collection `type`; "BDD releases" = the retired planner's job. Operator pointed
|
||||
at `ecomm-meta/research/shopify` (the ~1,238-scenario corpus, one file per
|
||||
scenario, slug = `DD-FF-NNNN`).
|
||||
3. **Design decisions** (all operator-confirmed): release ordering/ship/roadmap →
|
||||
**out** (downstream); **Approach A** one generic typed-field system; metadata
|
||||
grain = per-entry; schema in `.collection.yaml` `fields:`; values in **clean
|
||||
`<slug>.meta.yaml` sidecars**; faceted left-pane filtering with counts;
|
||||
single+bulk **direct-commit** tagging; in-app field management deferred.
|
||||
4. **Spec written** to the Solution Design standard (v0.1.0), committed.
|
||||
5. **Standard-shaping iterations** (operator drove a series of refinements to the
|
||||
spec *and* the canonical template/guide): value-only Executive Summary →
|
||||
Pain Points section → business-not-solution Outcomes → solution-agnostic
|
||||
Business Use Cases (concierge-fulfillable) → split Business Actors / Product
|
||||
Personas → **two-part front** (§1 Business Context solution-agnostic + §2
|
||||
Solution Proposal, may be non-software) → Business Actors moved ahead of the
|
||||
roles they're referenced by.
|
||||
6. **Superseded** the parallel `2026-06-06-per-type-surfaces.md` draft: harvested
|
||||
its validation seam, malformed-flag, unknown-fields-ride-along, engine-unchanged
|
||||
rule, N=1 backcompat; kept bdd coverage as a **future** `ref`-field surface;
|
||||
added **SLICE-0** to amend the binding `SPEC.md` §22.4a.
|
||||
7. **Process Q&A** → canonized a **per-slice execution convention** (one slice =
|
||||
one coding session, `writing-plans → executing-plans`, plan just-in-time) into
|
||||
the spec §7.1, the Solution Design guide/template §7.1, and **handbook §7**.
|
||||
8. **Finalize** → discovered the worktree hazard (below), recovered, landed both
|
||||
PRs via the Gitea API.
|
||||
|
||||
## The worktree-hazard recovery (the notable wrong-turn)
|
||||
|
||||
Partway through, the live concurrent session switched the shared checkout onto
|
||||
`main`. As a result **5 of my 6 spec commits landed on local `main`** (ahead-5),
|
||||
not on the feature branch (which held only the first commit). Content was always
|
||||
safe. Recovery (pointer-only / origin-side, to avoid disrupting the live session):
|
||||
`git branch -f docs/collection-metadata-design <full-work>` → push → Gitea-API PR
|
||||
**#26** → merge. **Local `main` left ahead-5** for the concurrent session to
|
||||
resync; the untracked `corpus-tree` design files (not mine) were left untouched.
|
||||
Lesson reconfirmed: parallel sessions on rfc-app must use isolated worktrees.
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifacts landed
|
||||
|
||||
- **rfc-app PR #26** → `origin/main`: `docs/design/2026-06-06-configurable-collection-metadata.md`
|
||||
(v0.1.6) + supersede banner on `2026-06-06-per-type-surfaces.md`.
|
||||
- **engineering PR #14** → `origin/main`: `solution-design/GUIDE.md`,
|
||||
`solution-design/TEMPLATE.md`, `README.md` (handbook §7).
|
||||
- Memory: updated `project_rfc_app_multiproject.md` (Next /goal → SLICE-0 landed);
|
||||
new `solution-design-authoring-principles.md` (the standard's rules).
|
||||
|
||||
## Deferred decisions
|
||||
|
||||
- **Holding all pushes/PRs for operator review** rather than auto-landing
|
||||
(autonomous default would land). Resolved at finalize: operator said merge now.
|
||||
- No other low-confidence calls — every structural/standard decision was the
|
||||
operator's explicit choice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Cut state
|
||||
|
||||
- Both PRs merged; spec + standard on their `origin/main`s.
|
||||
- rfc-app local `main` is **ahead-5** of origin (pending the concurrent session's
|
||||
resync) — intentional, not touched.
|
||||
- No code written this session (discovery only). The build starts at SLICE-0.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next-session prompt
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/goal Implement SLICE-0 of docs/design/2026-06-06-configurable-collection-metadata.md §7 —
|
||||
amend binding SPEC.md §22.4a so the entry schema is collection-configured .meta.yaml
|
||||
sidecar fields (not type-driven frontmatter), defer item-3 surfaces (bdd coverage =
|
||||
future ref surface), confirm the per-type-surfaces supersede, add the §20 changelog
|
||||
(doc-only). Then SLICE-1 (sidecar storage + dual-read + migration + malformed flag).
|
||||
Read memory project_rfc_app_multiproject.md first. Use an ISOLATED WORKTREE (§5.4) —
|
||||
a concurrent session shares the rfc-app checkout and local main is ahead-5.
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Session 0079.0 — Transcript
|
||||
|
||||
> App: ohm
|
||||
> Start: 2026-06-06T00-49 (PST)
|
||||
> Type: discovery
|
||||
> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> This file reserves session ID 0079 for ohm. The driver replaces this
|
||||
> body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final
|
||||
> SESSION-0079.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-06T00-49--<end>.md form at session end.
|
||||
|
||||
## Launch prompt
|
||||
|
||||
_(launch prompt not captured at claim time)_
|
||||
|
||||
## Deferred decisions
|
||||
|
||||
_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
|
||||
liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
|
||||
finalize. Empty if none._
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user