Propose: Closed- vs Open-Loop Classification #36
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
slug: loop-classification
|
||||||
|
title: Closed- vs Open-Loop Classification
|
||||||
|
state: super-draft
|
||||||
|
id: null
|
||||||
|
repo: null
|
||||||
|
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||||
|
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||||
|
graduated_at: null
|
||||||
|
graduated_by: null
|
||||||
|
owners:
|
||||||
|
- ben.stull
|
||||||
|
arbiters: []
|
||||||
|
tags:
|
||||||
|
- payments
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Whether stored value is clean store credit or a regulated money-transmission instrument turns on a single line: does value move only among commonly-owned storefronts, or between unaffiliated owners? This RFC defines that closed- versus open-loop classification, keyed to common ownership rather than storefront count. It documents the regulatory line the two-tier model rests on — it does not clear it, which remains a legal matter for counsel.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user