Compare commits
6 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04afcd9bd6 | |||
| a0a136fe3d | |||
| 96a11ec96c | |||
| 039555a85e | |||
| 619adde407 | |||
| 5abee1e203 |
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: agencyantimanipulation
|
||||
title: Agency & Anti-Manipulation
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
state: withdrawn
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: dignitycommerce
|
||||
title: Dignity in Commerce
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
state: withdrawn
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: dutyofcare
|
||||
title: Duty of Care & Vulnerability
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
state: withdrawn
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: epistemicauthority
|
||||
title: Epistemic Authority
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
state: withdrawn
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
|
||||
+7
-5
@@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: flourishing
|
||||
title: Human Flourishing (The Optimization Target)
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
state: active
|
||||
id: RFC-0002
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
graduated_at: '2026-06-04'
|
||||
graduated_by: ben.stull
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
arbiters:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- ethics
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Every platform optimizes for something; when that target is left implicit it silently becomes engagement, GMV, or time-on-site, and the mechanics follow it into harm. This RFC makes the optimization target explicit and contestable: what does this platform actually steer toward for the Humans in it? It is the affirmative answer the other ethical concepts are in service of, and every ranking, default, and notification cadence should be traceable back to it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: non-human-entities
|
||||
title: Non-Human Entities in OHM
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
state: active
|
||||
id: RFC-0003
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||
graduated_at: null
|
||||
graduated_by: null
|
||||
graduated_at: '2026-06-04'
|
||||
graduated_by: ben.stull
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
arbiters: []
|
||||
arbiters:
|
||||
- ben.stull
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- foundations
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
OHM is the Open *Human* Model, yet any real platform must also model things that are not humans — commerce nouns, instruments, systems. This RFC establishes how OHM may define a non-human entity at all: always in relation to the Human it serves, never as a free-standing abstraction. It is the conscious hinge on which the model broadens to hold commerce vocabulary without losing its human center, and it gives every later commerce concept a rule to be defined against.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: nonextraction
|
||||
title: Non-Extraction
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
state: withdrawn
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: privacydataminimization
|
||||
title: Privacy & Data Minimization
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
state: withdrawn
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
slug: wisespeechcommerce
|
||||
title: Wise Speech in Commerce
|
||||
state: super-draft
|
||||
state: withdrawn
|
||||
id: null
|
||||
repo: null
|
||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user