Graduate non-human-entities → RFC-0003

On-behalf-of: Ben Stull <ben.stull>

rfcs/agency-anti-manipulation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+slug: agency-anti-manipulation
+title: Agency & Anti-Manipulation
+state: super-draft
+id: null
+repo: null
+proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
+proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
+graduated_at: null
+graduated_by: null
+owners:
+- ben.stull
+arbiters: []
+tags:
+- ethics
+---
+
+A Human's Agency is only real if the platform refrains from manipulating the choices it presents. This RFC draws the line between legitimate persuasion and manipulation — no dark patterns, no drip pricing, no manufactured urgency, no lock-in disguised as a reward — as a first-class commitment derived from RFC-0001's Agency. It is the most direct expression of building for humans rather than for extraction.
+

rfcs/agencyantimanipulation.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 slug: agencyantimanipulation
 title: Agency & Anti-Manipulation
-state: super-draft
+state: withdrawn
 id: null
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org

rfcs/dignity-commerce.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+slug: dignity-commerce
+title: Dignity in Commerce
+state: super-draft
+id: null
+repo: null
+proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
+proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
+graduated_at: null
+graduated_by: null
+owners:
+- ben.stull
+arbiters: []
+tags:
+- ethics
+---
+
+Buyers and merchants alike can be treated by a platform as means rather than as people — in collections, in disputes, in fees, in failure states. This RFC establishes the floor of Dignity below which no commerce mechanic may push any Human. It is the baseline that the other ethical concepts refine and that every mechanic must clear.
+

rfcs/dignitycommerce.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 slug: dignitycommerce
 title: Dignity in Commerce
-state: super-draft
+state: withdrawn
 id: null
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org

rfcs/duty-of-care.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+slug: duty-of-care
+title: Duty of Care & Vulnerability
+state: super-draft
+id: null
+repo: null
+proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
+proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
+graduated_at: null
+graduated_by: null
+owners:
+- ben.stull
+arbiters: []
+tags:
+- ethics
+---
+
+Some Humans are vulnerable — in financial distress, elderly, or minors — and the platform's money mechanics (stored value, breakage, balance-parking discounts) are exactly the ones that can prey on them. This RFC defines a duty of care toward vulnerability as a first-class commitment, so the sharpest edges of the credit model are watched rather than ignored. It serves Dignity and care, building on Agency and Dignity in Commerce.
+

rfcs/dutyofcare.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 slug: dutyofcare
 title: Duty of Care & Vulnerability
-state: super-draft
+state: withdrawn
 id: null
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org

rfcs/epistemic-authority.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+slug: epistemic-authority
+title: Epistemic Authority
+state: super-draft
+id: null
+repo: null
+proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
+proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
+graduated_at: null
+graduated_by: null
+owners:
+- ben.stull
+arbiters: []
+tags:
+- governance
+---
+
+When the system and a Human disagree about reality — did the payment settle, was the item as described, who is right in a dispute — whose account counts? This RFC applies OHM's commitment to the Human as the authority on their own life to commerce, including the deliberate, argued exceptions where a human claim is demoted (for example, 'shown is not settled' demotes a buyer's claim to have paid). Those exceptions must be principled and narrow, not a general license to override the person.
+

rfcs/epistemicauthority.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 slug: epistemicauthority
 title: Epistemic Authority
-state: super-draft
+state: withdrawn
 id: null
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org

rfcs/flourishing.md

@@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
 ---
 slug: flourishing
 title: Human Flourishing (The Optimization Target)
-state: super-draft
+state: active
-id: null
+id: RFC-0002
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
 proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
-graduated_at: null
+graduated_at: '2026-06-04'
-graduated_by: null
+graduated_by: ben.stull
 owners:
 - ben.stull
-arbiters: []
+arbiters:
+- ben.stull
 tags:
 - ethics
 ---
 
 Every platform optimizes for something; when that target is left implicit it silently becomes engagement, GMV, or time-on-site, and the mechanics follow it into harm. This RFC makes the optimization target explicit and contestable: what does this platform actually steer toward for the Humans in it? It is the affirmative answer the other ethical concepts are in service of, and every ranking, default, and notification cadence should be traceable back to it.
 
+

rfcs/non-extraction.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+slug: non-extraction
+title: Non-Extraction
+state: super-draft
+id: null
+repo: null
+proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
+proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
+graduated_at: null
+graduated_by: null
+owners:
+- ben.stull
+arbiters: []
+tags:
+- ethics
+---
+
+A platform may need to capture value to survive, but the moment it sustains itself by extracting from the very Humans it serves, it has betrayed them. This RFC defines Non-Extraction as the structural commitment that separates this platform from the Shopify-style model of referral fees, payment markups, and sponsored placement. It is the load-bearing claim behind 'better for owners and customers,' and it makes that claim checkable rather than rhetorical.
+

rfcs/non-human-entities.md

@@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
 ---
 slug: non-human-entities
 title: Non-Human Entities in OHM
-state: super-draft
+state: active
-id: null
+id: RFC-0003
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
 proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
-graduated_at: null
+graduated_at: '2026-06-04'
-graduated_by: null
+graduated_by: ben.stull
 owners:
 - ben.stull
-arbiters: []
+arbiters:
+- ben.stull
 tags:
 - foundations
 ---
 
 OHM is the Open *Human* Model, yet any real platform must also model things that are not humans — commerce nouns, instruments, systems. This RFC establishes how OHM may define a non-human entity at all: always in relation to the Human it serves, never as a free-standing abstraction. It is the conscious hinge on which the model broadens to hold commerce vocabulary without losing its human center, and it gives every later commerce concept a rule to be defined against.
 
+

rfcs/nonextraction.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 slug: nonextraction
 title: Non-Extraction
-state: super-draft
+state: withdrawn
 id: null
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org

rfcs/privacy-data-minimization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+slug: privacy-data-minimization
+title: Privacy & Data Minimization
+state: super-draft
+id: null
+repo: null
+proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
+proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
+graduated_at: null
+graduated_by: null
+owners:
+- ben.stull
+arbiters: []
+tags:
+- ethics
+---
+
+A Human has an interior life and the standing to keep most of it private; a platform that hoovers up data treats the person as a resource to be mined. This RFC commits the platform to knowing only what the exchange genuinely requires and no more — surveillance is not the business model. It serves Interiority and Dignity, and sets the default against which every data-collecting mechanic must justify itself.
+

rfcs/privacydataminimization.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 slug: privacydataminimization
 title: Privacy & Data Minimization
-state: super-draft
+state: withdrawn
 id: null
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org

rfcs/transparency-traceability.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+slug: transparency-traceability
+title: Transparency & Traceability
+state: super-draft
+id: null
+repo: null
+proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
+proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
+graduated_at: null
+graduated_by: null
+owners:
+- ben.stull
+arbiters: []
+tags:
+- governance
+---
+
+Ethics that cannot be checked are just claims. This RFC defines the discipline that every operational mechanic must cite the concept RFC it serves, so the platform's behavior is auditable and traceable back to a stated human commitment. It is the spine that keeps the whole corpus honest — the answer to how 'ethical' becomes verifiable rather than asserted.
+

rfcs/wise-speech-commerce.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+slug: wise-speech-commerce
+title: Wise Speech in Commerce
+state: super-draft
+id: null
+repo: null
+proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
+proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
+graduated_at: null
+graduated_by: null
+owners:
+- ben.stull
+arbiters: []
+tags:
+- ethics
+---
+
+Listings, prices, and reviews are speech the platform either keeps honest or lets deceive. This RFC applies OHM's foundational Wise Speech value to commerce: descriptions that are truthful, prices that do not mislead, and a platform that does not amplify deceptive speech for its own gain. It protects a Human's ability to choose on the basis of true information.
+

rfcs/wisespeechcommerce.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 slug: wisespeechcommerce
 title: Wise Speech in Commerce
-state: super-draft
+state: withdrawn
 id: null
 repo: null
 proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org