Compare commits
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6aae0c31f5 |
+9
-11
@@ -1,18 +1,16 @@
|
|||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
slug: human
|
slug: human
|
||||||
title: Human
|
title: Human
|
||||||
state: super-draft
|
state: active
|
||||||
id: null
|
id: RFC-0001
|
||||||
repo: null
|
repo: wiggleverse/rfc-0001-human
|
||||||
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||||
proposed_at: '2026-05-26'
|
proposed_at: '2026-05-26'
|
||||||
graduated_at: null
|
graduated_at: '2026-05-26'
|
||||||
graduated_by: null
|
graduated_by: ben.stull
|
||||||
owners: []
|
owners:
|
||||||
arbiters: []
|
- ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||||
|
arbiters:
|
||||||
|
- ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||||
tags: []
|
tags: []
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
OHM is the collection of RFCs in this repository, and every subsequent RFC will, in some way, model or interact with the Human entity. A shared, dedicated definition of what a Human is in OHM is the prerequisite for everything that comes after it — Identity, Interiority, Agency, Relationality, Temporality, Wise Speech, Informed Consent, and any future work all depend on a common understanding of what is being modeled in the first place. Without that foundation, every subsequent RFC has to re-litigate the question of what a Human is on its own terms, and the framework as a whole loses coherence.
|
|
||||||
This RFC establishes that foundation. It treats the definition of Human as substantial in its own right — expanding the five foundational properties (Identity, Interiority, Agency, Relationality, Temporality), making explicit what a Human is inherently the expert on (their experience, feelings, body, needs, wants, values, intentions, meaning), and articulating four cross-cutting commitments (Embodiment, Epistemic Authority, Whole-Brain Representation, Dignity) that condition how all five properties may be modeled. It also takes a position on Personhood — when a Human enters standing within the model — grounded directly in the definition itself. With this in place, future RFCs can be proposed and evaluated against a stable, articulated foundation.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user