Compare commits
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52a0636a4f | |||
| 0aee4fd308 |
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
slug: dutyofcare
|
||||||
|
title: Duty of Care & Vulnerability
|
||||||
|
state: super-draft
|
||||||
|
id: null
|
||||||
|
repo: null
|
||||||
|
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||||
|
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||||
|
graduated_at: null
|
||||||
|
graduated_by: null
|
||||||
|
owners:
|
||||||
|
- ben.stull
|
||||||
|
arbiters: []
|
||||||
|
tags:
|
||||||
|
- ethics
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Some Humans are vulnerable — in financial distress, elderly, or minors — and the platform's money mechanics (stored value, breakage, balance-parking discounts) are exactly the ones that can prey on them. This RFC defines a duty of care toward vulnerability as a first-class commitment, so the sharpest edges of the credit model are watched rather than ignored. It serves Dignity and care, building on Agency and Dignity in Commerce.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user