Compare commits
8 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a567fe1afe | |||
| 75cd7c9c55 | |||
| cb1a2b912b | |||
| cc1be2dd7e | |||
| 64fdf71994 | |||
| 63907ba8e6 | |||
| 7f2c4f8f57 | |||
| 943e757c8e |
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
slug: non-human-entities
|
||||||
|
title: Non-Human Entities in OHM
|
||||||
|
state: super-draft
|
||||||
|
id: null
|
||||||
|
repo: null
|
||||||
|
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||||
|
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||||
|
graduated_at: null
|
||||||
|
graduated_by: null
|
||||||
|
owners:
|
||||||
|
- ben.stull
|
||||||
|
arbiters: []
|
||||||
|
tags:
|
||||||
|
- foundations
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
OHM is the Open *Human* Model, yet any real platform must also model things that are not humans — commerce nouns, instruments, systems. This RFC establishes how OHM may define a non-human entity at all: always in relation to the Human it serves, never as a free-standing abstraction. It is the conscious hinge on which the model broadens to hold commerce vocabulary without losing its human center, and it gives every later commerce concept a rule to be defined against.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
slug: stored-value
|
||||||
|
title: Stored Value / Credit
|
||||||
|
state: super-draft
|
||||||
|
id: null
|
||||||
|
repo: null
|
||||||
|
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||||
|
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||||
|
graduated_at: null
|
||||||
|
graduated_by: null
|
||||||
|
owners:
|
||||||
|
- ben.stull
|
||||||
|
arbiters: []
|
||||||
|
tags:
|
||||||
|
- payments
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Stored Value is the root money concept the ecommerce platform's credit model hangs on: value a Human has loaded and now holds on the platform, deliberately constrained — not cashable, not transferable out, and explicitly not a stablecoin. The constraint is not incidental; it *is* the definition, and it must be defined in relation to the Human whose money it is. Removing cash-out closes the redemption-fraud vector and the money-transmission trigger — but it also removes an exit the Human would otherwise have, so the concept must hold that tension in the open rather than hide it behind 'store credit.'
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Establishing Stored Value as a first-class OHM entity lets every downstream mechanic — Load, Settlement, Discount, Breakage, Float — cite one contestable definition of 'what the balance is' instead of each re-deriving it. It serves Agency (the Human's own money, with its exit deliberately removed) and Temporality (a balance persists, and a person's relationship to it changes over time). It is also where OHM broadens to hold a commerce noun, defined in service of the Human rather than the ledger.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user