On-behalf-of: Ben Stull <ben.stull>
This commit was merged in pull request #43.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
slug: epistemic-authority
|
||||||
|
title: Epistemic Authority
|
||||||
|
state: super-draft
|
||||||
|
id: null
|
||||||
|
repo: null
|
||||||
|
proposed_by: ben.stull@wiggleverse.org
|
||||||
|
proposed_at: '2026-06-01'
|
||||||
|
graduated_at: null
|
||||||
|
graduated_by: null
|
||||||
|
owners:
|
||||||
|
- ben.stull
|
||||||
|
arbiters: []
|
||||||
|
tags:
|
||||||
|
- governance
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When the system and a Human disagree about reality — did the payment settle, was the item as described, who is right in a dispute — whose account counts? This RFC applies OHM's commitment to the Human as the authority on their own life to commerce, including the deliberate, argued exceptions where a human claim is demoted (for example, 'shown is not settled' demotes a buyer's claim to have paid). Those exceptions must be principled and narrow, not a general license to override the person.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user